| Christianity Christian issues and discussions of Christianity. |
07-11-2006, 05:44 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
The Righteous Man
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 221
|
Was it a cross?
Though us Christians usually argue that Jesus was killed on a cross, the Bible doesn't unambiguously state this. The greek words in the Bible that are translated by Christians as cross are stauros and xy'lon; the former actually means stake/pole, while the latter literally means stick/tree. Death by being tied to a stake of wood, hands above head, was employed by the Romans, and this so-called crux simplex (simple cross, though not actually cross-shaped) may have been the form of death that the Bible actually describes Jesus as having had. There have been suggestions that Jesus died having been nailed to a tree. Roman documents, on the other hand, suggest that in Judea, criminals were usually crucified on a Y-shaped device. But what do you think?
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 07:45 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Flour Power
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,305
|
Re: Was it a cross?
It was a scaffold, but it made a lousy amulet because it looked like a pound sign. #
Chris
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 08:33 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
What was the question?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,429
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Azure24
Though us Christians usually argue that Jesus was killed on a cross, the Bible doesn't unambiguously state this. The greek words in the Bible that are translated by Christians as cross are stauros and xy'lon; the former actually means stake/pole, while the latter literally means stick/tree. Death by being tied to a stake of wood, hands above head, was employed by the Romans, and this so-called crux simplex (simple cross, though not actually cross-shaped) may have been the form of death that the Bible actually describes Jesus as having had. There have been suggestions that Jesus died having been nailed to a tree. Roman documents, on the other hand, suggest that in Judea, criminals were usually crucified on a Y-shaped device. But what do you think?
|
He was hung from wood. It was in such a way that He could no longer breathe, and subsequently that combined with the beating He took was too much...He died.
v/r
Q
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 08:34 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
What was the question?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,429
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by China Cat Sunflower
It was a scaffold, but it made a lousy amulet because it looked like a pound sign. #
Chris
|
Good possiblity Chris.
v/r
Q
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 11:07 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Soul Rebel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 4,789
|
Re: Was it a cross?
The shape of the cross is an interesting topic - I'm under the impression that a "X" was also a possibility. In fact, in early Christianity, the Chi-Rho symbol of an "X" with a "P" over the center was the main symbol for Christianity, so far as I understand it, which literally depicted Jesus on a cross.
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 03:25 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
~~~~~~~~~
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gator Country, FL, USA
Posts: 4,695
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by I, Brian
The shape of the cross is an interesting topic - I'm under the impression that a "X" was also a possibility. In fact, in early Christianity, the Chi-Rho symbol of an "X" with a "P" over the center was the main symbol for Christianity, so far as I understand it, which literally depicted Jesus on a cross.
|
From what little I have read, this was the symbol adopted by the Jesuits, a sort of logo if you will, to denote that monastic order.
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 04:18 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Executive Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,560
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Azure24
Though us Christians usually argue that Jesus was killed on a cross, the Bible doesn't unambiguously state this. The greek words in the Bible that are translated by Christians as cross are stauros and xy'lon; the former actually means stake/pole, while the latter literally means stick/tree. Death by being tied to a stake of wood, hands above head, was employed by the Romans, and this so-called crux simplex (simple cross, though not actually cross-shaped) may have been the form of death that the Bible actually describes Jesus as having had. There have been suggestions that Jesus died having been nailed to a tree. Roman documents, on the other hand, suggest that in Judea, criminals were usually crucified on a Y-shaped device. But what do you think?
|
yes you are right the bible does not say cross. its good to stick to the bible then we are not led along to other things. many translators have been led along to put cross in their bibles when it should not be there in the first place.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 08:31 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
What was the question?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,429
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by I, Brian
The shape of the cross is an interesting topic - I'm under the impression that a "X" was also a possibility. In fact, in early Christianity, the Chi-Rho symbol of an "X" with a "P" over the center was the main symbol for Christianity, so far as I understand it, which literally depicted Jesus on a cross.
|
Still used in the Catholic church, usually on alter cloths and clerical vestments.

|
|
|
07-14-2006, 01:29 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Soul Rebel
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 4,789
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Yes, that's the one - wasn't aware that it was still in use, actually. Not seen much of it around after the Byzantines fell.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 01:45 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Live without fear
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 70
|
Re: Was it a cross?
The Sign of the Cross, I was taught, originated as a way for Christians to identify other Christians during the time Christianity was being oppressed by Rome. That would indicate, at least to me, that even the early Christians thought Jesus was crucified on a cross. So, true or not, the story of Jesus being crucified on a cross is quite old indeed, originating possibly in the first or second centuries of the common era.
|
|
|
07-18-2006, 11:24 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
demned elusive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Limburg, Netherlands
Posts: 191
|
Re: Was it a cross?
I have read that the Romans had ready-made posts sticking in the ground at the place of execution, and criminals carried their own crosspiece up to the place of execution. Then their arms were fastened to the crosspiece (tied, nailed, whatever) and they were hoisted up to the post. I like this version because it seems to me to reconcile the different viewpoints.
|
|
|
07-18-2006, 03:11 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
What was the question?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,429
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scarlet Pimpernel
I have read that the Romans had ready-made posts sticking in the ground at the place of execution, and criminals carried their own crosspiece up to the place of execution. Then their arms were fastened to the crosspiece (tied, nailed, whatever) and they were hoisted up to the post. I like this version because it seems to me to reconcile the different viewpoints.
|
Also, the punishment of execution by crucifixion was a practice carried out by the Romans until 312 A.D., when it was banned by Constantine. Which means there is secular historical evidence to show that the instrument of death, was indeed, a "cross" (or two lengths of timber perpendicular to each other), on which a human was "restrained" to by various means, until he or she died.
In fact there are the remains of a physical person who was crucified (nails and all), between 1 and 70 A.D. (interestingly, in Jerusalem). His ossuary reads “Yehohanan, the son of Hagakol.” Why only one body, out of thousands allegedly crucified? Obviously his family was allowed to provide for a proper burial. Normally, the convicted were left on the cross until the animals and environment multilated and destroyed the body until little remained, a part of the punishment. Not only did the Romans execute the "guilty" but humiliated and dishonored them in this way.
More can be found on this subject in the book by Vassilios Tzaferis. “Crucifixion -- The Archaeological Evidence".
v/r
Q
|
|
|
07-18-2006, 03:52 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 28
|
Re: Was it a cross?
The 'P' and 'x' thingy is the Chi Rho. Depicting the first 2 (greek) letters of the word christ. It's also called the Labarum.
Sub
has a lot of particulars associated with it. Wiki it for more info.
|
|
|
07-26-2006, 11:06 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Executive Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,560
|
Re: Was it a cross?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Karimarie
The Sign of the Cross, I was taught, originated as a way for Christians to identify other Christians during the time Christianity was being oppressed by Rome. That would indicate, at least to me, that even the early Christians thought Jesus was crucified on a cross. So, true or not, the story of Jesus being crucified on a cross is quite old indeed, originating possibly in the first or second centuries of the common era.
|
The Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics says: "With the 4th cent[ury] magical belief began to take a firmer hold within the Church." As with a magic charm, simply making the sign of the cross was thought to be "the surest defence against demons, and the remedy for all diseases." Superstitious use of the cross continues to this day.
|
|
|
07-26-2006, 11:11 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Executive Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,560
|
Re: Was it a cross?
 ohhhhhhhhh this looks just like my old dog , he is getting on a bit now thou, it surprised me when i saw this picture on the post above,
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.
|