Was Gen 15:6 mistranslated?

[Quahom1]

Since this in an exercise in "Comparative studies", that is where I'm moving the thread to.

v/r

Q

[Excaliburton]

Originally Posted by Quahom1

Since this in an exercise in "Comparative studies", that is where I'm moving the thread to.

v/r

Q

It seems this Christian discussion of Genesis has been sent to the attic. Fortunately, this topic is being discussed in many other circles other than here. In the last days, knowledge shall be greatly increased.

[Excaliburton]

Originally Posted by BlaznFattyz

Habakkuk 2:4 Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith.

Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. 17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

Galatians 3:11 But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.

Hebrews 10:38 Now the just shall live by faith: but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him.

"By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God. But without faith it is impossible to please Him: for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a Rewarder of them that diligently seek Him" (Hebrews 11:5-6).

Abraham is a story of faith. He loved the lord, obeyed him, had faith in him and because of that he pleased the lord; therefore he was blessed.

OK, but does the OT ever say that Abraham was motivated by faith or by fear?

Gen 22:12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only [son] from me.

Hebrews chapter 11 gives a whole list of famous biblical personalities and claims they were motivated by faith, but there is no confirmation of this in the OT nor are there marginal references that verify Hebrews 11 in the OT.

[Excaliburton]

Originally Posted by InLove

Then, it is your prerogative to choose to try and keep every jot and tittle of that Law. But it is also an individual's right to choose, by faith, to allow those jots and tittles be interpreted through the Holy Spirit...the Spirit of the Law, so to speak.

InPeace,
InLove

If you can find a verse to prove that Jesus said we were allowed to pick and choose what laws we would obey, please share it with us. The Talmud had been used by the Jewish Pharisees to find excuses not to obey the Torah, and Jesus was not shy about mentioning it:

Mar 7:9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

[Excaliburton]

Originally Posted by Quahom1

Well since you have reported me, to me, as being abusive, you have my full attention.

You bring up issues, and others here (including me), disagree with your conclusions. You bowl right over our opinions, and proceed to "correct" and "lecture" us on our apparent ignorance...what would you call that? Loving reflection, or rebuking the bumbling bumpkins, who don't know their Bible from a post it pad?

I am pleased that you have taken time to study the Bible intensely for the past five years. So have I, and Kenod, and Thomas, and many others here, for even longer...so you see, there are no ignorant people here. And my friend, no one cares for the implication of such. That, is abusive, sir.

This is a discussion board, not a Lecture hall.

v/r

Q

Simply offering a different viewpoint does not necessarily imply a pedantic attitude but rather an opportunity for further discussion.

If you feel I have not responded to your points, please specify.

But it seems you have been entirely unresponsive to my point in which I showed the blatant contradiction between Gen 26:5 and Romans 4:13. That is an issue that cannot be ignored forever. But if you have an answer, I would like to hear it.

[Quahom1]

Originally Posted by Excaliburton

Simply offering a different viewpoint does not necessarily imply a pedantic attitude but rather an opportunity for further discussion.

If you feel I have not responded to your points, please specify.

But it seems you have been entirely unresponsive to my point in which I showed the blatant contradiction between Gen 26:5 and Romans 4:13. That is an issue that cannot be ignored forever. But if you have an answer, I would like to hear it.

I see no contradiction. What I see is that:

1. Abraham obeyed God
2. It was because of Abraham's faith in God that he obeyed.

In Genesis we are told what Abraham did. In Romans we are told why Abraham did what he did.

It is quite frequent in the Old testament that God instructs without explaining why. In the New Testament we are frequently given explanations for the reasons God instructed man on issues, in the first place.

v/r

Q

[Quahom1]

Originally Posted by Excaliburton

It seems this Christian discussion of Genesis has been sent to the attic. Fortunately, this topic is being discussed in many other circles other than here. In the last days, knowledge shall be greatly increased.

It has been sent to the appropriate forum, as you are comparing your studies and conclusions with others' studies and conclusions.

v/r

Q

[Quahom1]

Originally Posted by Excaliburton

OK, but does the OT ever say that Abraham was motivated by faith or by fear?

Gen 22:12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only [son] from me.

Hebrews chapter 11 gives a whole list of famous biblical personalities and claims they were motivated by faith, but there is no confirmation of this in the OT nor are there marginal references that verify Hebrews 11 in the OT.

The "fear" is awe, and respect. Abraham trusted God, despite the external appearance of things. Trust is faith and hope.

v/r

Q

[Excaliburton]

Originally Posted by Quahom1

I see no contradiction. What I see is that:

1. Abraham obeyed God
2. It was because of Abraham's faith in God that he obeyed.

In Genesis we are told what Abraham did. In Romans we are told why Abraham did what he did.

It is quite frequent in the Old testament that God instructs without explaining why. In the New Testament we are frequently given explanations for the reasons God instructed man on issues, in the first place.

v/r

Q

Paul said Abram received the promises not because he obeyed God but because he had faith.

Gen 26:5 says Abram receives the promises because he obeyed God.

Obedience is the intrinsic factor, not faith.

The condition of Abram's hearing also contributed to his obeying God, for he had to have ears to hear God's commands, but neither faith nor hearing are the intrinsic factors that causes the promises to be given.

BTW, faith is only mentioned twice in the OT, and the Hebrew word from which it is rendered, emunah, is not equivalent to the Greek NT word for faith pistis.

Another point is that if faith were the intrinsic cause of the promises, then works of obedience would not be necessary, "lest Abram should boast", as Paul was fond of saying.

Yet Gen 26:5 indicates the promises were given because of works of obediience.

[Quahom1]

Originally Posted by Excaliburton

Paul said Abram received the promises not because he obeyed God but because he had faith.

Gen 26:5 says Abram receives the promises because he obeyed God.

Obedience is the intrinsic factor, not faith.

The condition of Abram's hearing also contributed to his obeying God, for he had to have ears to hear God's commands, but neither faith nor hearing are the intrinsic factors that causes the promises to be given.

BTW, faith is only mentioned twice in the OT, and the Hebrew word from which it is rendered, emunah, is not equivalent to the Greek NT word for faith pistis.

Another point is that if faith were the intrinsic cause of the promises, then works of obedience would not be necessary, "lest Abram should boast", as Paul was fond of saying.

Yet Gen 26:5 indicates the promises were given because of works of obediience.

Obedience is not work. It is compliance with that or whom which we believe has the authority. To believe is to have faith.

The promises were given to one who obeyed because he believed in the authority of the One demanding the obedience.

Obeyance is nothing to boast about. It is a duty to be carried out, because it is the right thing to do.

v/r

Q

[mee]

But what is faith? The apostle Paul wrote: "Faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for, the evident demonstration of realities though not beheld." (Hebrews 11:1)
(Galatians 3:11) Moreover, that by law no one is declared righteous with God is evident, because "the righteous one will live by reason of faith."
"You behold that [Abraham’s] faith worked along with his works and by his works his faith was perfected."—JAMES 2:22.
faith backed up by complete obedience
Jehovah said that Abraham’s offspring, not Abraham himself, would receive the land as an inheritance. (Genesis 12:1, 2, 7) How did Abraham react? He was willing to serve Jehovah wherever and however God directed so that his offspring could receive their inheritance

[Dondi]

I have to agree with Q. Obedience is not a work. What Paul was speaking of was works of the law. Abraham came before the Law of Moses, therefore His obedience worked in conjunction with faith in God, as James indicated.

When the young rich ruler came to Jesus in Luke 18:18-29, and asked, "Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?", what did Jesus say? He basically asked if the young rich ruler kept the commandments, to which he replied that he had. Jesus didn't argue that he didn't keep the commandments, did He? But it wasn't enough, was it? Jesus told him he lacked one thing. Give up all he had to the poor and follow Jesus. Mere adherence to the commandments is not enough. There is something more to it, namely faith to trust God with everything you have.

Unfortunately, the rich young ruler went away sad for he couldn't give up the temporal things he had for eternal life. He lacked faith in God.

Furthermore, even if one is able to obey the commandments, if that were even possible, unless there is a relationship with God through the Holy Spirit, then that person will not inherit eternal life anyway, for he is obeying God in his own strength and his own righteousness (see Isaiah 64:6). But it is the Spirit of God that will raise a person to life. Which is why Jesus said that we must be born again of the Spirit of God, that we might keep the commandments in love. That is the difference.

[wil]

I appreciate the move to comparative....look forward to seeing input from the other schools of thought that use Genesis..

[Excaliburton]

Originally Posted by Quahom1

Obedience is not work. It is compliance with that or whom which we believe has the authority. To believe is to have faith.

The promises were given to one who obeyed because he believed in the authority of the One demanding the obedience.

Obeyance is nothing to boast about. It is a duty to be carried out, because it is the right thing to do.

v/r

Q

Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.

There is no verse in the OT that says
"The promises were given to one who obeyed because he believed in the authority of the One demanding the obedience."

Nor is there any verse in the OT that says:
"For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, [was] not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.

Deu 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

[Quahom1]

Originally Posted by Excaliburton

Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.

There is no verse in the OT that says
"The promises were given to one who obeyed because he believed in the authority of the One demanding the obedience."

Nor is there any verse in the OT that says:
"For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, [was] not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.

Deu 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

And I'm not a puppet. I go beyond the "thou shalt", into the why "thou Shalt". It is called "contemplating" (my father in law calls it cogitating). It means to sit and consider why a situation occured the way it did. Really, you think man should sit there and simply carry out orders without ever wondering why? Sometimes knowing why, makes the carrying out of orders easier to do, even if it means there will be consequences that are not liked.

Why did Abraham keep God's laws? hmmm? Because he was a robot? Because he was afraid of God? I'm surprised he didn't wet his pants, let alone fail to move or speak before God...unless there was more of a relationship between Abraham and God, than we are aware of. First off, Abraham already knew God. A trust was established between the two. Time went on and then it came upon a moment where God needed to test that trust. Here is the kicker. God needed to know if man would give up all for Him. This would determine what God would do next. (remember, with man God introduced the element of uncertainty). Man was willing to give up all for God (thank Abraham for that), and God opined that He could do no less for man...so at the right moment, enter the Son of God.

You know what. yes there is everything noted above in the Bible that you smugly state there is not. Your superior intellect blinds you to the facts.

However, here is a fact that is undeniable. You will carry your knowledge of all, by yourself, and to your grave, and it won't be missed (though I'm certain you will be). And the world will continue on, though none will say you helped it to. Because all you do is tear things down, in the name of truth! no less. Ok, who's truth? Yours? Or God's?

I don't know what to tell you. I only know that you hurt people, not with your words of superior intellect and knowledge, but your attitude. And I step in front of you, because I think you should not cause harm to others. I don't believe you, because I've read the good book too. Your opinion is not the general Christian opinion. Your way offers no solace or alternative, except to declare the Christian/Judeac God is dead, so are we all. I do not accept that Excaliburton.

The next step is yours.

v/r

Q