|
||||||||
|
|||||||
| Abrahamic Religions Neutral discussion area for topics that cross-over between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
Spirit Guided
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bluegrass state
Posts: 345
|
Re: The Love of God
Quote:
Am I a Christian? Yes, in the sense that I try to follow his Spitrit, and serve God by walking in that straight and narrow... Much Love, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
|
Interfaith
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 896
|
Re: The Love of God
Thanks for your reply Cage. Are you a J. Witness? You sound like me...I trip, fall, etc., too. But, I repent and trust Christ knowing that all of the good works I do is to no avail, but that only Christ is my righteouness. How about you? Is your trust in Christ co-operating with your good deeds, or are you doing good deeds but knowing that it apart from Christ, it is worthless before God? Also you mentioned something about spirit. What do you mean by that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |
|
Spirit Guided
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bluegrass state
Posts: 345
|
Re: The Love of God
Quote:
About that Spirit...Well, I fully believe God's Spirit is Love my friend. Feel free to disagree, but it has convicted me like nothing else has, and I understand its power, guidence, purity, holiness, and mercy. It can come only from God, and this is what I cling too, along with the knowledge that God is Love, and that this same Spirit was fully manifest in Jesus the Christ. I follow Christ because he did his fathers will, if I am saved [in a perfect after life] because I follow him, then that my friend is a great bonus. If not, then I will die knowing I did my best to serve God, and appreciate what he gave me [in this life]. Much Love, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Re: The Love of God
I thought I did, but OK. How about this, I'll let you come to your own conclussion. How many times does scripture say that Christ died for "many" "his people" "His chruch" "His people from every tounge nation and tribe" vs the times it says that Christ died for the "world" or even "all" people. That may be good a good place to start, I think.
Since when does the number of times something is said count? Let me put it this way: if Christ did not die for everyone, as you seem to be saying, then there are a number of people for whom it is impossible to be saved, because Christ's sacrifice did nothing for them. That is how I understand what you are saying, and perhaps I am misunderstanding. Oh what AMAZING Love God has Shown to Sinners!! His own Beloved Son whom He fellowshipped with in Eternity past, whom He loves with undying Love, was crushed by Him [God the Father] to save the wickedest of man. Stand in awe of that kind of Love. Its unknown to the world. Eventhough the Bible is clear that God does everything for His own Glory, I cannot deny that He loves people. In fact, I am still in awe of it. I am especially amazed that He would love me! God hates sinners, right? You acknowledge that you are a sinner, right? Then, presumably God hates you. Or does He love you even though you're a sinner, because you took refuge in Christ? The problem I have is understanding how a being that is love, takes it upon Himself to hate people who don't follow His rules. God's love isnt based on anything is us, but soley on His own will and good pleasure - its unconditional - He does save because they sinner was good, moral, better that the rest, had faith, etc. Again, its on Him who choose to show mercy. I keep telling you guys, read Romans 9. If God hates people for any reason, then His love is not unconditional. If God can only love someone after they have repented their sins and come to Christ, then His love is based upon that condition of repentance and coming to Christ. It was from my Pink notes. Yo, you said that was eisegesis. Whoa! Where do you see that he erred? Read them again and tell me where, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. OK, for instance the second one, and this is a small one. It says kosmos pertains to earth, as in the planet we live on, right? Well, that is obviously reading into it with an understanding that Jesus went to a place that was specifically not Earth, implying that he is in the universe somewhere. Whereas if it is read as world, it means he left this world, plain and simple, i.e. He did not fly off to another planet. You get the point. I'm not saying that eisegesis in these cases is a bad thing, but in some cases, e.g. John 3:16, it leads people to the wrong conclusions. An exegetical reading of that verse simply states that Jesus died for the world, not for the Jews only, nor solely the Gentiles, but everyone. Thus everyone has the opportunity to come to Christ, because he payed the ransom for everyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |
|
Interfaith
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 896
|
Re: The Love of God
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Interfaith
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 896
|
Re: The Love of God
Since when does the number of times something is said count? Let me put it this way: if Christ did not die for everyone, as you seem to be saying, then there are a number of people for whom it is impossible to be saved, because Christ's sacrifice did nothing for them. That is how I understand what you are saying, and perhaps I am misunderstanding.
Yes, you are minunderstanding me. Christ' attoning death is more than enough to save ALL men indivisually, but was only designed to save those the Father has given to the Son from out of the whole world. If Christ died to save all, all would be in Heaven, since God always accomplishes what He wills to do (Job 23:13). If Jesus paid the price for sin (and He did) and justify men before God (and He did) then those in Hell are being charged with double jeopardy.The problem with those who opt for free will is they limit the atonment the wrong way. They suppose that Christ only died to provide the gift of Salvation, where as the Bible makes it clear that He died to secure or guarantee, salvation. God hates sinners, right? You acknowledge that you are a sinner, right? Then, presumably God hates you. Or does He love you even though you're a sinner, because you took refuge in Christ? The problem I have is understanding how a being that is love, takes it upon Himself to hate people who don't follow His rules. You suppose that Love governs God, thats where you err. God is Thrice Holy. God swares by His holiness, never his love. God saves for the Sake of His own holy name and glory first - always, before any other attribute. So yes, God DOES Love the world with an amazing Love (gets more amazing once you understand His Holiness), but He's not governed by His love. Dont suppose that God is in Heaven crying and hoping that people come to Christ. He knows His sheep. He's forknown His Sheep. And, He foreordained His sheep. God is happy! If God hates people for any reason, then His love is not unconditional. Where does the Bible say His Love is unconditional? If God can only love someone after they have repented their sins and come to Christ, then His love is based upon that condition of repentance and coming to Christ. Amen. Prior to coming to Christ people are called "children of wrath" and "enemies of God" in scripture. But to those who have recieved Christ, scripture calls them "children of God." OK, for instance the second one, and this is a small one. It says kosmos pertains to earth, as in the planet we live on, right? Well, that is obviously reading into it with an understanding that Jesus went to a place that was specifically not Earth, implying that he is in the universe somewhere. Whereas if it is read as world, it means he left this world, plain and simple, i.e. He did not fly off to another planet. You get the point. You might want to read that again bro. Here, I'll qoute it. Check out all the different translation to get a clearer picture if you want. Its clear that in context "komos" is refering to the universe. Acts 17: 24...The God who made the world and everything in it, who is Lord of heaven and earth." Note that God has made the "world" and "everything" in it. Thats everything - the whole universe. I'm not saying that eisegesis in these cases is a bad thing, but in some cases, e.g. John 3:16, it leads people to the wrong conclusions. An exegetical reading of that verse simply states that Jesus died for the world, not for the Jews only, nor solely the Gentiles, but everyone. Thus everyone has the opportunity to come to Christ, because he payed the ransom for everyone. Thats not in the text. Whats in the text is that "everyone who believe has eternal life," everyone who doesnt believe is 'already' condemned," and "God sent His Son for 'those who beleive' that they may have eternal life." Those who opt for free will choice are not only the ones eisegiting (unknowingly), but are also arguing from a wrong premis - namely, that Jesus only "offers salvation" rather than actually guaranteeing it and justifying men before the Father. They have a weak gospel and one that really isnt good news. It says to men..."Hey, I know you love sin and will choose what is in your nature to choose (sin and not God), but Im sending Jesus to die for you anyway. And, if you could muster enough willingness to will against what you love, namely sin, you can have your sins forgiven." Thats a very tough task bro. Actually, its impossible. Jesus said we can do NOTHING without being in Him. How are sinners who arent in Him going to do something when we in Him cant? The Free will argument makes zero sense. Its only argued from an emotional stand point and from a very of a very human god. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) | |
|
Spirit Guided
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bluegrass state
Posts: 345
|
Re: The Love of God
Quote:
What does holy mean to you, silas? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Interfaith
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 896
|
Re: The Love of God
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Spirit Guided
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bluegrass state
Posts: 345
|
Re: The Love of God
The cross offends me, and I think his life was/is more significant than his brutal death. I choose to see his life, his ways, his Spirit, and I look away from the cross because it was something very unholy to happen to such a holy man. I'll hold on to his life, follow, and accept that we killed him because of the sin in our hearts, but for the moment, I'll go no further than that. I cherish his life, what he gave me, his Spirit, and his ways. I will follow, and let the real Chrstians keep the wickedness and violence of the cross, as it means a great deal to you.
I am more liberal, and I like it that way; it just suits me. I've been fed traditional Christians views all my life, and they won't stick, so let that be, Silas, and accept that I accept Jesus for his life, and follow him because I see his worthiness to be followed. When and if I ever get babtized, it will be in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I will accept Jesus life for leading me, and accept the Spirit for its further guidence and grace, and I will accept the father for giving me both for my benefit. Fair enough? Much Love, |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
Interfaith
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 896
|
Re: The Love of God
The cross offends me, and I think his life was/is more significant than his brutal death.
Oh. Thats what you meant by liberal view. OK. I choose to see his life, his ways, his Spirit, and I look away from the cross because it was something very unholy to happen to such a holy man. It happened because He was saving people from God's wrath. All Christian in the Bible as well as throughout the years have loved what the cross stood for, since it is reperesents what occured to save us. I'll hold on to his life, follow, and accept that we killed him because of the sin in our hearts, but for the moment, I'll go no further than that. God the Father killed Him (Isa. 53) and you could never follow Jesus' example, you're infinitely far away then He is - thats why He suffered agony and death. Trust in Him alone and repent of your good works, else you trip over your own righteouness. Read Romans 3. I cherish his life, what he gave me, his Spirit, and his ways. I will follow, and let the real Chrstians keep the wickedness and violence of the cross, as it means a great deal to you. We Christians glory over Chris' perfect life, but we never forget the cross. How could we? "As for me, God forbid that I should boast about anything except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. Because of that cross, my interest in this world died long ago, and the world's interest in me is also long dead" (Galatians 6:14)." I am more liberal, and I like it that way; it just suits me. I've been fed traditional Christians views all my life, and they won't stick, so let that be, Silas, and accept that I accept Jesus for his life, and follow him because I see his worthiness to be followed. Thats fine. Know however, that you have another gospel and that the Jesus of the Bible doest accept you if you havent see your sins and great need for His sacrifice. To mock is suffering and sacrifical death is to be rejected by God. When and if I ever get babtized, it will be in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Why? I will accept Jesus life for leading me, and accept the Spirit for its further guidence and grace, and I will accept the father for giving me both for my benefit. Fair enough? You dont accept things from God, you recieve it. What is man that he could "accept" God and things from God. You're guilty of breaking God's laws, He has to accept you. He will if you come through the right Christ. |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) |
|
Spirit Guided
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bluegrass state
Posts: 345
|
Re: The Love of God
I follow the same Christ you serve, and I would never mock the cross. I have recieved god's Love/Spirit, and I have accepted and embraced it. I have accepted Christ as a master, leader, even savior, but I follow his life, and I know I am on the right path. I feel it, believe it, I have peace within, and I am thankful. You have your path of worship, and I have my path of following. Don't assume I have less than you, or that God recieves me less because I find the cross' brutality offensive.
You're are free to express your views, but do not claim you have the only right way of viewing and following Christ, bro. I don't deny what happened on the cross, I merely stick to his life and Spirit. I accept your path to be just as worthy as my own, and I respect our differences. Pleas have the same respect for me, Silas. Much Love, |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) |
|
Interfaith
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 896
|
Re: The Love of God
I follow the same Christ you serve, and I would never mock the cross. I have recieved god's Love/Spirit, and I have accepted and embraced it. I have accepted Christ as a master, leader, even savior, but I follow his life, and I know I am on the right path.
Good. Follow Christ' life and know that the only reason you can do good is by God's grace and that apart from Christ your good works are filty. Knowing this, love and trust in Christ all the more because apart from Him along, you like myself, are God's worst enemies. I feel it, believe it, I have peace within, and I am thankful. Dont go by feel or emotions. Our emotions, feelings, heart, and mind are all sinful. We feel things we should not and we desire things we shouldnt. THis should testify to the depravity of the heart. Trust alone in Christ and judge yourself by the word of God, the Bible. You have your path of worship, and I have my path of following. Don't assume I have less than you, or that God recieves me less because I find the cross' brutality offensive. I am no worse than any sinner. In fact, I feel at times that I'm worse. But thats another story. Hug the cross homey! Boast in NOTHING else but it. Its because of the cross (what it stands for) that we have a right standing with the Thrice Holy God who is angry at sinners every day (Psa. something - I forget). You're are free to express your views, but do not claim you have the only right way of viewing and following Christ, bro. I dont. I only reitterate what the Bible says. Apart from those words Im slient. I don't deny what happened on the cross, I merely stick to his life and Spirit. I accept your path to be just as worthy as my own, and I respect our differences. Pleas have the same respect for me, Silas. Sorry homey. Im called to adhere to the Bible. I dont mean to be disrespectful or intolerant, but I gotta follow my master. If He was hated for telling the truth, then I cant be surprise if I recieve the same consequence for telling what He said. "If Christ preached the same messasge of "love" that most of these preachers, especially tv preachers preached today, He would have never been crusified." -- Lenord Ravenhill. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) |
|
UNeyeR1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,612
|
Re: The Love of God
Namaste Silas,
Please to remember while you say you mistakenly put started this thread in Abrahamic...the fact is this is where it is. So in this area we discuss theology and respect all of Christianity AND Judaism AND Islam....which means it is not my way or the highway and we do not inform others that they are mistaken from the aspect of our form of Christianity... One of a few things start happening here when someone continues to berate others... a. many folks just start ignoring threads or posts which you respond to. b. you may find your niche of well wishers and happily preach to the choir. c. one with the power to do so pulls the plug and you have to go back to the soap box on the street corner with the megaphone. It is all your choice my brother, we are in someone elses house, we play by their rules. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| john1;1-2 | mee | Christianity | 47 | 12-02-2006 04:49 PM |
| Christians! Do you believe Mohammed's prophethood? | PersonaNonGrata | Abrahamic Religions | 96 | 11-13-2006 03:48 PM |