|
||||||||
|
|||||||
| Esoteric Esoteric traditions and Mysticism, Gnosticism, Wisdom Traditions and alternative thought. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||
|
Executive Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Trans-Himalayas
Posts: 762
|
The "False Venus"
Hello fellow travelers,
From the Elder Brothers, Lucifer & Contrast: Quote:
We find talk of this false-Venus today some in newage doctrines. Ashtar, Ishtar, are names (very old names for Venus gods actually) that one finds have a connection with this. Again the teaching is one of leaving the Earth for far-off realms. In Goethe's Faust, Mephistopheles makes clear his hatred of Creation- Quote:
Is Lucifer the serpent in the Garden of Eden? To speak accurately it is a "Luciferic principle". In Steiner's teaching on this he says Quote:
Foundations of Esotericism, Rudolf Steiner Our only protection and redemption is in Christ: The more like Him that I become the more He shall reveal to me that I should know my Christ, my Sun and live His Love's intensity. I call, oh Lord, for you this day Be known, that never shall I leave Your Grace, In Presence here, my Christ, my Sun, By mercy sweet, my sins atone. And now, forthwith, with copious Love Your contestants lose virility, Yet men who seek their Christ, their Sun Increase their strength commendably. -Br.Bruce |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
ex-member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 641
|
Re: The "False Venus"
The only problem here that I see, Bruce, is that we may find a confusion in terminologies! For instance, note that in the Agni Yoga teachings, or The Teaching of Living Ethics, Master M. speaks often of "the far-off worlds." When doing so, He means something quite in line with the Purpose, Nature and Spirit of the Christ.
Further, this is quite in accord with the definitions, and understanding of Lucifer, as given out by HPB and by Alice Bailey - yet almost ironically, not with those of Master M. Himself!!! If anything, it is precisely because Lucifer chose to cut the Earth off from the far-off worlds, and to "isolate" our own evolution (thus prolonging our status as a non-Sacred planet), that the New Era, and Christ's Reappearance, are so pained at this time ... Far Off Worlds – These terms refer on the one hand to higher dimensions and realms of existence and on the other to the material bodies of the Cosmos. (INF I, 120) When We summon to the far-off worlds, it is not for a detachment from life but for a discovery of new ways. Only in realizing participation in Infinity may one reach the upper spheres. If we trace the development of the human spirit from the very primitive forms, we will perceive that the variety of forms of the primary spirits branch out into corresponding manifestations. One may call the forms of the present day forms aspiring toward perfection. The forms of the future correspond to the far-off worlds. Having deprived itself of the knowledge of cosmic vistas, humanity has dissociated itself from the manifestations of Infinity and has lost the thread of unity with the beauty of life and with cosmic energy. This cleavage is cruel, and the lost thread turns into a thin cobweb of reality. We, the Brothers of Humanity, know that there exists a great unembellished and indestructible Reality. Affirm yourselves in the acceptance of the great beauty of Infinity! Let the far-off worlds live in the consciousness of men as a wondrous kingdom. This is just as indisputable and just as real as the fact that a growing seed gives birth to a flower. The far-off worlds are interpreted only as something illustrative of the concept of distance. But let us regard the far-off worlds—the life there is affirmed in beauty and in striving for achievement; there are the fires of spirit; there is the fire of love; there the seeming excrescences of Earth are transformed into creations of Fire. The fires of the spirit carry knowledge that the passing of the present and the striving into the better future will be the ladder upon which we shall ascend. (INF I, 44) Lucifer – Lucifer is now at the head of the Black Brotherhood, which is very powerful, for it has co-workers among the masses over the entire span of the planet. (LHR II, p 419) Wherein lay the revolt of Lucifer? He wishes to remain within the boundaries of the planet. And the legend of the Prince of the World is fairly true. He began to surround himself with spirits content with the earthly aura. In order to hold his followers he began to unfold before them the possibilities of earth, imitating—at times with skill—the counterposition of the opposing side. ... Without him there would not be a definite boundary between the earth and the nearest spheres. Without him the difference between life on earth and on other spheres would be gradually effaced, permitting to incarnate spirits the movability of matter. But the Prince of the World, in opposition chains matter to the crust occupied by him. ... Hence you shall have to depart to Saturn; for this, have you long been called Satan. (EC, pp 119-122) What, then, is to be done if Satan has so firmly implanted distrust. (FW II, 135) Verily, Satan himself saturates the world with fanaticism. (FW III, 330) An old proverb says: "The bridle of Satan is strong." Another: "He who has seen the image of Satan will never forget it." Ancient peoples upheld the concept of the inertness of human consciousness. Our chief counsel is to inculcate a reasonable mobility. (AY, 524) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Executive Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Trans-Himalayas
Posts: 762
|
Re: The "False Venus"
Hi Br. Andrew,
>"the far-off worlds." When doing so, He means something quite in line >with the Purpose, Nature and Spirit of the Christ. The point being made here, is that we do not desert Earth evolution. (Satan on the other hand wishes to bind us to the Earth forever.) Satan is not Lucifer. We have the concept of the Eighth Sphere: (There is some disagreement on where it is.) Quote:
It's interesting that that Mara is Lucifer. Hence you shall have to depart to Saturn; for this, have you long been called Satan. (EC, pp 119-122) |
|
|
|
|