www.comparative-religion.com
 
Comparative religion: 

world religions
 

Go Back   Interfaith forums > Religion, Faith, and Theology > Comparative Studies
Register Code of Conduct Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Comparative Studies Comparing religious beliefs across human history and cultures

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-11-2003, 08:12 PM   #46 (permalink)
bob x
Executive Member
 
bob x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogodnomasters
The serpent had to be close to Adam and Eve according to the pattern. Adam is Leo, Eve is Virgo.
Why? How about Adam=Cepheus, Eve=Cassiopeia? Or Adam=Scorpio, Eve=Bootes? Any constellation is as arbitrary in any role as any other, for all that you have said so far.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogodnomasters
Corvus was associated with the fig tree (hence a slight connection) . Next to Corvus is Crater, the cup. This was the ancient sacred cup which gave everlasting life and knowledge. It was the Holy Grail in Chrsitianity, however 2000 BCE it would have been the fruit of the tree of knowledge.
What does a crow have to do with a fig tree? What does a cup have to do with a piece of fruit? You are not giving any reasoning for associating any star-group with anything in particular.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogodnomasters
For instance Noah released a dove. This dove is the constellation Columba, which is a dove, known as "the dove of Noah."
That constellation was first given that name in the 17th century AD. It is named after the story: the stories come first, and then star-groups are named for mnemonic purposes; the star-groups themselves don't suggest any particular story.
bob x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2003, 01:09 PM   #47 (permalink)
Nogodnomasters
General Member
 
Nogodnomasters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob x
Why? How about Adam=Cepheus, Eve=Cassiopeia? Or Adam=Scorpio, Eve=Bootes? Any constellation is as arbitrary in any role as any other, for all that you have said so far.
What does a crow have to do with a fig tree? What does a cup have to do with a piece of fruit? You are not giving any reasoning for associating any star-group with anything in particular.
That constellation was first given that name in the 17th century AD. It is named after the story: the stories come first, and then star-groups are named for mnemonic purposes; the star-groups themselves don't suggest any particular story.
Columba is a questionable constellation as the story appears where the verses should be removed. I.E. the whole story of the dove was added later. It appears between 8:3-4 when the earth dried and ark rested and again between 8:13,14 when the earth dried up. Is it a coincidence that those who named the constellation placed it under Noah (Orion) and east of the ark (Argo?) or did they know or suspect something?

The mythical tale of Corvus is associated with a fig tree. Drinking from the cup gave knowledge as did eating of the fruit.

Cephus, Cassiopeia, Bootes, and Scorpio are used elsewhere.

Leo and Virgo are the constellations normally associated with Adam and Eve. Hebrew entomology of the word Adam means to be flush or make red. This is associated with the red star Regulus. In Egypt Atum was the double red faced lion associated both with Leo and the setting sun. Regulus would be also associated with the rising sun as YHWH placed a rotating sword of fire in the east.

The god Ptah created Atum from a lump of clay. He puts sight in his eyes, hearing in his ears and breaths in his nostrils.

Adam is based on Atum and Atum is Leo. In translating from Egyptian to Hebrew, vowels are interchangable as are the letters "d' and "t" or so I have read. This would make the spellings of the names identical, although that is not as important as the similarities in the tales.

Eve or Virgo was created from Adam's rib. A midrash claimed Adam had a tail or tailbone was used. There is a shared star between Virgo and Adam known as Sarcam, which literally means "the joining."

Leo means "to tread upon the serpent" or "Old serpent destroyed". It's paws are above Hydra. Other stars in Leo are Al Dafera, "the enemy put down" Denebola, "the judge" and Denab Aleced "the judge who comes and seizes" all which relate to the serpent story and god's judgment.

Eve or Hawwah is explained by Robert Graves as possibly being the Hebrew version of Heba, Hebat, Khebat, or Khilba. She is depicted as riding a lion in a sculpture. She was worshipped in Jerusalem. Her Greek name was Heba, Heracles' goddess-wife.

Eve is similar to Demeter or Ceres as the grain goddess, or the godess of the garden. This is Spica, an ear of corn. On Denerah Virgo is Isis. Spica in Hebrew astrology is named Tsemech or "branch". This name is symbolic of a coming son or branch. Al Mureddin another star in Virgo is "the branch that cometh" and is associoated with a grape gatherer (Noah) who would reddem man from the curse of the earth by giving us wine.

In Babylon, Virgo was the human wife of the god Bel (Canaanite Baal.) As the wife of Bel she represented an earthly virgin, in that she did not intercourse with mortal men. Bel was the son of Ea (Canaanite El) . He was the "Lord of Wisdom" . When he spoke a word it was created.

The Persians figured that Ursa Minor was the Myrobalanum (plum fruit used in dyeing), or date-palm seed or fruit, which the group stars was thought to resemble. The date palm is seen as a symbol of the world axis (or polar axis), or Tree of Life. ("The righteous shall flourish like the date palm" -Psalm 91: 12). In their Eden or Eridu as it was called the tree was called “the shrine of the two”. On an Assyrian cylinder the early couple is pictured as sitting by the seven branched tree with a serpent by the woman. The legend of the fall comes from the third tablet of the creation. There was a command established “in sin one with the other in compact joined.” The fruit that the couple ate was “broke in two, its stalk destroyed. Great is their sin. Themselves are exalted. The gods then appointed their fate.” This apparently evolved into the fall of man. The Hebrews did not use Ursa Minor, but copied the story.

The Babylon marriage ritual reminds us of the garden:

Dumuzi says: “My sister, I would go with you to the garden.
Inanna, I would go with you to my garden.
I would go with you to my orchard.
I would go with you to my apple tree.
There I would plant the sweet, honey covered seed.”

It is from Babylon we get the idea the fruit is an apple and associated with sexual sin.

The story of Corvus: “Under Corvus was the story that Apollo sent a crow to fetch water in the god's cup. The crow got back very late, because he waited at a fig tree for some luscious figs to ripen before returning. He brought back a water snake along with the water-filled cup and told Apollo that the serpent had caused the delay. Apollo, however, could not be deceived by the lie. The angry god placed the crow, the cup (Crater) and the water snake (Hydra) among the stars, where the snake guards the water from the everlastingly thirsty crow.”

The fig tree, the blaming of the serpent and deceit are all elements of the tale of Eden.

There are several schools of thought on the correct Biblical astral theology. I have presented what I believe to be the correct interpretation. For instance, the serpent at the heel of either the woman and/ or her offspring could also be seen in the relationship of Virgo to the constellation Libra. At one point in time Virgo-Libra-Scorpio were considered one constellation. The ‘J” school of thought claims Leo/Virgo/Hydra was a serpent at the heel of Leo. Massey disagrees and relates everything to Draco/ Hercules. A case could even be made for Ophiuchus/Scorpio. One can fit all the jig-saw pieces together and not have a picture. The continuity of this work would demand that Leo/Hydra is the correct selection as those other constellations are used elsewhere.

Nogodnomasters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2004, 02:14 AM   #48 (permalink)
Nogodnomasters
General Member
 
Nogodnomasters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 192
The Hebrews' Circular Time Line

Our whole idea of placing the Bible text into a historical time line is that we think of time lines as linear. When we try to impose linear thinking on a circular object we fail. Remember this was God’s history, his writing, his story, his way of thinking. It was not for man to fully understand- until now.

A simplified view of the Circular Time Line is “history repeats itself.” The Hebrews chose this view of history because it matches the heavens. All that happens on earth happens in the heavens- over and over again.

Let’s create a hypothetical situation to understand this. Suppose an American history book is written covering the time from the American Revolution through World War II. Now let’s suppose the events written about were considered to be the design or intent of God herself. These events were placed in the heavens using the names of some existing constellations and stars and fabricating names of others.

This was God’s history. It is circular. Time as we know it does not stop at World War II. Now let’s suppose somewhere along the line it was decided the Vietnam War was ordained by God and part of the overall big picture of His history. Instead of tacking this episode on to end of the saga for a linear time line, it is inserted somewhere in the existing history. In this case let’s again presume we have a star/constellation involving jungle warfare in Asia in the Philippines at the turn of the century. Vietnam would be deemed to be similar to the warfare in the Philippines and placed in their constellation/star. This addition may just be a just a simple “and Vietnam” tacked on to “the Philippines” or it may be a full blown insertion describing aspects of the war, including military hardware.

This is not a problem for those who see this as God’s circular word, but raises havoc with the future historian or archeologist who attempts to create a linear time line form the circular one.

The best example of a story in the Bible which has drove historian bonkers attempting to place is the saga of Moses and the Exodus. No matter what period one picks there are strong arguments for and against it. This is because there at least three Moses stories from three separate and distinct time periods.

The first one was from the Early Bronze Age. This was the original story which equates Moses to Sargon I. There was another Exodus in play with the Hyksos expulsion from the Middle Bronze Age, hundreds of years later. There are also elements of conquered cities from the Iron Age, and /or perhaps a reference to the invasion of the People of the Seas or the Habiru. This was about a thousand years later from the original text. Researchers do not realize they are looking at least three different periods blended as one tale.

Another addition was that of Hammurabi as David/Solomon. This would come at the end of the saga as that is where it occurred astrologically. Apparently Hammurabi was identified with the constellations of Sagittarius and the Southern Crown.

At some point in time years were added to the Bible text. I am speculating that perhaps some of these time periods mean something in the relationship of Earth years to the astrological cycle. There was a 400 year gap between Joseph and Moses. It is possible this was added when the author (s) added the Middle Age expulsion to the tale. This was done to indicate this was on a different cycle or loop from the original text by attempting to separate the pharaohs in the story. I would conjecture 400 years was considered the approximate time of an astrological history cycle. Another common time period used in the Bible is 40 years. This I would infer was considered the time frame of a constellation story. After 40 years it was time to move to a new constellation. Moses wondered the desert for 40 years (Cetus.) David ruled for 40 years (Sagittarius.) Solomon ruled for 40 years (Southern Crown.)
Nogodnomasters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2004, 09:03 AM   #49 (permalink)
I, Brian
Soul Rebel
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 4,604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogodnomasters
This is because there at least three Moses stories from three separate and distinct time periods.

The first one was from the Early Bronze Age. This was the original story which equates Moses to Sargon I. There was another Exodus in play with the Hyksos expulsion from the Middle Bronze Age, hundreds of years later. There are also elements of conquered cities from the Iron Age, and /or perhaps a reference to the invasion of the People of the Seas or the Habiru. This was about a thousand years later from the original text.
This is a striking statement - I would be interested to see how this is supported from an achaeological/historical argument, rather than an astrological one (presuming that is the case). Do you have any more information on this argument? If so, it could make for an interesting new thread.
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 06:11 PM   #50 (permalink)
Nogodnomasters
General Member
 
Nogodnomasters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 192
Actually I am just scratching the surface on this one. This was the logical conclusion that came out of the astrology idea. We can eliminate the astrology aspect, but then one would ask, "why did they use a circular time line?"

There are many texts which were added to the original even if one simply used the concept of the Wellhausen and using the Book of J as the original text.

Some stories or ideas which were added:

First creation
Lineage from Seth to Noah
Mt. Ararat, the dove, the raven
Nimrod
Tower of Babal.
Lot's daughters
Abraham in Egypt
Hagar and Ismael
Entire story of Solomon as king
Children of Saul and their relationship with David
All of David's wives except Bethsheba
Joshua crossing the River Jordan
Barren birth of Issac
The second conquest of the Joshua of the 5 kings-which lists different cities in case you haven't noticed
Everything in between Samson and the story of David vs. Goliath
Joseph and Potiphar's wife and his rise from prison
Many details from the story of Moses including all references to Aaron. (Things that stay- floating in a basket, evil Pharaoh, Moses wife-Midianite,Gershom, a few plagues, burning bush, river crossing, Mt. Sinai- getting one set of 10 commandments, conquest of Amorites and bonding with the Moabites- no desert wondering for 40 years, no rebuilding of the Egyptian city, no Heshbon)
No pillar of salt for Lot's wife.
Only two cities destroyed, not 5.
Nogodnomasters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2004, 08:38 PM   #51 (permalink)
I, Brian
Soul Rebel
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 4,604
That may be, but how does J relate to a Moses-Sargon I construct, as well as reference to Hyksos and the sea-peoples?
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2004, 12:14 AM   #52 (permalink)
Nogodnomasters
General Member
 
Nogodnomasters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 192
Moses-Sargon is a classic relationship in the birth tale. Not many people are found floating down a river in a basket, but in this case both these guys were. There are a few other similarities too in this tale. What is interesting is that Moses' basket was sealed with pitch. This substance was not used to a much later period in Egypt. This indicates the story originated elsewhere- such as Babylon where Sargon's basket was sealed with Bitumen. Both Moses and Sargon were conquerors of the Amorites. Other than this they don't seem to have a lot in common. The story of Sargon:

“My lowly mother conceived and bore me in secrecy; placed me in a basket of rushes; sealed with bitumen, and set me in a river, which how­ever did not engulf me. The river bore me up. And it carried me to Akku, the irrigator, who took me from the river, raised me as his son, and made me a gardener: and while I was a gardener, the goddess Ishtar loved me. Then I ruled the kingdom…”


Sinuhe is the tale of an Egyptian palace official. At the death of the old king, he fears strife and flees Egypt to build a new life in exile under a ruler in Syria. At the height of his powers he is challenged to a duel by a Syrian champion: Sinuhe kills his opponent in the duel, and begins a period of peace. The amazing tale of this era combines the basic elements of the story of Moses and David. It is dated at the death of Amen-em-het I circa 1960 B.C.E. Sinuhe was an archer and would have been associated with the constellation Sagittarius. His fight against Retenu has some of the elements of David vs. Goliath.

Avaris (Ex 1:11) was the capital city of the Hyksos.

The Amarna Letters written circa 1350-1334 BCE have elements of the invasion of Joshua.

Jericho and Ai however both fell nearly a thousand years earlier.

Arad, a city conquered by Moses fell circa 2700 BCE while Arad the next city he conquered didn't exist until 1500 years later.

The Sea Peoples (not too sure how they relate to the Bible) attacked Ramesses III circa 1175 BCE, this was the time Bible chronology places the Hebrews as conquering and settling their home land. This attack on Egypt is the background for the sea attack on Egypt in Homer's work.

The Hittites were destroyed circa 1150 BCE with only a few very small settlements having survived. This makes Uriah as a Hittite an unlikely senerio for a David circa 950 BCE. In fact the destruction of Palestine was so complete, this area was in a "dark age" at a time when the Bible tells us great city states existed as a United Monarchy. These great Canaanite city states existed in the Middle Bronze Age and were ruled over by Babylon. Hammurabi, the great wise law giver, writer of proverbs etc. was the ruler.

The most famous king in this era was Hammurabi who created a creed or law which was believed to have influenced the laws of the Hebrews. In 1986 Dean Hickman published an article The Dating of Hammurabi where he gathers evidence that Hammurabi was a contemporary of David and Solomon. Rather than place David and Solomon in the era of Hammurabi, for which we have evidence; he opted to place Hammurabi in the 10th century B.C.E. to be a contemporary of the supposed era of David and Solomon, for which there is no archaeological evidence. He lists similarities between Zimri-Lim, a contemporary of Hammurabi and Rezin (or Rezon), Syrian adversary of King Solomon, and son of Eliada (I Kings 11:23).

Hammurabi's opponents are: Zimri lim (king of Mari, 1780-1760 B.C.E.), Samsi-Adad (king of Assur, 1810-1785 B.C.E.) and Rim-Sim (king of Larsa, with a long reign 1825-1765 B.C.E.) Samsi-Adad is Hadadezer, the Syrian, David’s opponent.

Hammurabi obtains a monopoly over Mesopotamia by a combination of clever politics and military successes. This era was also known as the age of proverb writing. The court tales and battles of David and Solomon would be of this period. There is no evidence for a United Monarchy such as this in the 10th century B.C.E.


Hammurabi was Solomon.

Also originally Adam's wife had no name. Eve was later added circa 1600 BCE (my guess-height of Hittite influence on Jerusalem) as a Hittite influence of the goddess Heba. Prior to this they believed his wife was named Lilith, a name of Babylonian influence. This is why her name appears in the Midrashes. The original text was based on a Babylonian myth where the woman was a goddess and only the man gets exiled from paradise (several versions, in some the woman leaves too.)

In Genesis 3:23-24 only "the man" is driven from paradise. Nothing is mentioned about the woman. The story was doctored. The curses were added as was the name Eve to make it appear she got the boot also.



Nogodnomasters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2004, 03:39 AM   #53 (permalink)
Thresher
New Member
 
Thresher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 12
I just finished reading the Book of Hiram. It has some interesting theories and ideas on the role of astronomy/astrology from the alignment of temples to the shekinah. It's an interesting read.
Thresher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Missing Books of the Bible foundationist.org Christianity 30 06-20-2008 10:02 AM
Astrology! I, Brian New Age 32 07-21-2007 05:23 PM
Gender usuage in the Bible I, Brian Abrahamic Religions 2 09-10-2003 04:02 PM
Bible Code Software! brian Belief and Spirituality 2 06-13-2003 12:12 PM
Bill Hicks foundationist.org Lounge 5 04-06-2003 02:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.