Survey: Americans switching faiths, dropping out

[wil]

Survey: Americans switching faiths, dropping out

....The U.S. Religious Landscape Survey estimates the United States is 78 percent Christian and about to lose its status as a majority Protestant nation, at 51 percent and slipping.
More than one-quarter of American adults have left the faith of their childhood ....
One in four adults ages 18 to 29 claim no affiliation with a religious institution....

The Roman Catholic Church has lost more members than any faith tradition because of affiliation swapping, the survey found. While nearly one in three Americans were raised Catholic, fewer than one in four say they're Catholic today. That means roughly 10 percent of all Americans are ex-Catholics...

...Hindus claimed the highest retention of childhood members, at 84 percent.

The group with the worst retention is one of the fastest growing -- Jehovah's Witnesses. Only 37 percent of those raised in the sect known for door-to-door proselytizing said they remain members.

... most Buddhists were converts. More people in the survey pool identified themselves as Buddhist than Muslim, although both populations were small -- less than 1 percent of the total population. By contrast, Jews accounted for 1.7 percent of the overall population....

...more...

[Still thinking]

Now this could be either very encouraging or very disappointing, depending on how you choose to look at it. A seeker and an optimist such as myself would say that people are no longer content to blindly accept the faith of their fathers and are seeking their own truth, refusing to be spoon-fed. A more fundamentalist religious person might say it's a horrible tragedy that people are turning away from God, and that our country is most certainly headed towards ruin. A pessimist or non-spiritual person could see it as simple laziness, perhaps an improvement on our Christian based society.

As someone cursed with the ability to see both sides of a situation, I often have a hard time choosing. Part of me thinks this is a sad commentary on our times, and part of me wants to see it as a hopeful turn from fundamentalism. Hmmm, thoughts, anyone?

[Dream]

The baseline is that every new generation starts over again. The percentages always go up and down just like in political factions. The negative aspects of the dominant party stimulates interest in the other party -- not because its so much worse but because its so much better understood. The dynamics of religion balances and dances with government dynamics over the long term, stabilizing and destabilizing.

[Paladin]

Interesting survey. Of course like any survey it only gives us a little knothole to peep through. For instance it cannot show us the number of people beginning to look inside themselves to find universal truths, nor can it show us the percentage of people attracted to alternate types of spiritual endeavors.
Not being a statistician I couldn't tell you what it would take to get a broader or more concise view, but hopefully mankind is spiraling upward in values and consciousness.

[path_of_one]

I think it is interesting that Hindus have such a high retention rate. As a social scientist, I wonder why this is. Is it tied to ethnic enclaves? Or that Hinduism is very diverse internally, so it allows for everyone to do something that fits with their spiritual experience? Hinduism always seemed to me to be very inclusive, so perhaps it's hard to leave if you're included no matter what your spiritual path is!

The Amish have exceptionally high retention rates as well (I believe over 85%). Interestingly, as they have increasingly become more different from their surrounding subcultures, this retention rate has gone up. They retain more of their youth now than they did 100 years ago.

What I wonder about with the statistics is the group of folks like me- I was raised spiritual but not religious and without religious affiliation. Well, my dad was Lutheran, but I was mostly raised by my mom who did not have religious affiliation. She considered herself a follower of Christ but not a member of any Christian church. While I sometimes go to church, I don't consider myself a member of any church either. So I am pretty much stable to how I was raised. I wonder how many people these days fit into that category- raised spiritual but not religious and now are the same.

[Paladin]

Perhaps people migrate from path to path because as they grow spiritually or intellectually, they can no longer be supported by the group. If you speak a language outside of what the group considers its normal parameters you might find yourself being marginalized more and more. Most groups I associate with are like this. For example, twelve step groups are fairly dogmatic in their application and understanding of the texts used. Even Buddhist groups are this way as well. Religious science (new thought) are the same way and members can often be heard to say things like " well, whats in your consciousness?" if you discuss experiences or have an inquiry not covered in their doctrine.
I guess it would take a Social Scientist to figure stuff like this out.

[flowperson]

Most of the major religions on earth today built big pictures of belief thru mythos in the past to justify doctrinal veracities upon abstractions that fit the increasingly outward oriented lives of their followers. About the only religion that did not fit that pattern is Hinduism, simply because their foundational stories and myths still rest upon a foundation of individual observations and mythos based upon observations of nature. This also might speak to it's internal diversity and cohesiveness.

flow....

[cyberpi]

Originally Posted by Paladin

I guess it would take a Social Scientist to figure stuff like this out.

Does a Social Scientist have the social skills to talk with God?

[juantoo3]

I'm glad somebody pointed to this, it was all over the news yesterday.

Although I do think the parameters are a bit harsh, going by what I heard on the tv last night. Apparently the surveyors considered it "changing" if one switched from one denomination/sect/variation of what I would call a religion. I can understand a Christian becoming Buddhist or an atheist becoming Muslim being called a change in religion, but I hesitate to say that switching from Methodist to Presbyterian is really changing religion.

FWIW, I still "feel" the same way I do about G-d now as I did as a child, although the words and labels I use to describe that may have altered a bit through the years.

[juantoo3]

Originally Posted by path_of_one

While I sometimes go to church, I don't consider myself a member of any church either. So I am pretty much stable to how I was raised. I wonder how many people these days fit into that category- raised spiritual but not religious and now are the same.

That's pretty close to where I come from. Mom was nominally Catholic, but I think I saw the inside of a Catholic church maybe 4 or 5 times that I recall. She did take us to an assortment of Protestant churches from time to time while I was growing up. Dad didn't get religion until many years later, long after I did.

I still don't think G-d is about churches. In some way, that whole concept of "church" just doesn't resonate with me, since I can remember (around 5 years old). Churches might as well have been meat ("meet"?) markets, so many of the young adults I remember went primarily looking for a date for the next weekend...

[Tao_Equus]

Originally Posted by cyberpi

Does a Social Scientist have the social skills to talk with God?

Does someone with blind faith?

[Thomas]

Hi Still Thinking ...

I wasn't going to respond here ... being orthodox Roman Catholic, our attitudes are rarely welcome in modern society ... but as you invited I thought I'd put in a view.

Originally Posted by Still thinking

Now this could be either very encouraging or very disappointing, depending on how you choose to look at it.

As is the case with most things statistical.

Originally Posted by Still thinking

A seeker and an optimist such as myself would say that people are no longer content to blindly accept the faith of their fathers and are seeking their own truth, refusing to be spoon-fed.

A seeker and optimist such as myself would say this implies the content of faith is inadequate ... which from the ample evidence is obviously not the case.

It also implies that people can't be bothered to make the effort to look for themselves, but rather look to who's offering the bigger spoon to feed them with. It's a symptom of a me-orientated consumer society. As consumers, we're educated to reward ... if there's no tangible reward forthcoming, we change product loyalty.

"One's own truth" is something of a modernist fallacy — truth then becomes utterly subjective, a matter of opinion. Looking for the 'truth of self' is setting oneself to be the arbiter of truth, and to function properly, without error, requires one to be omniscient.

In a culture that is aimed at self-comfort, the challenge offered by religion is often an unapetising one...

Thomas

[Ciel]

Originally Posted by Thomas

"One's own truth" is something of a modernist fallacy — truth then becomes utterly subjective, a matter of opinion. Looking for the 'truth of self' is setting oneself to be the arbiter of truth, and to function properly, without error, requires one to be omniscient.

Thomas

Thomas,

If you were not seated in your own truth would you have found the omniscience of the Catholic church as connective truth?

- c -

[wil]

Originally Posted by Thomas

A seeker and optimist such as myself would say this implies the content of faith is inadequate ... which from the ample evidence is obviously not the case.

It also implies that people can't be bothered to make the effort to look for themselves, but rather look to who's offering the bigger spoon to feed them with. It's a symptom of a me-orientated consumer society. As consumers, we're educated to reward ... if there's no tangible reward forthcoming, we change product loyalty.

Namaste Thomas,

I believe that is evidenced by the study.

Originally Posted by wil

The Roman Catholic Church has lost more members than any faith tradition because of affiliation swapping, the survey found. While nearly one in three Americans were raised Catholic, fewer than one in four say they're Catholic today. That means roughly 10 percent of all Americans are ex-Catholics....

Perhaps you'd have some insider insight why those seekers raised Catholic moved on?

At our church we seem to be a sort of way station for seekers. We have any number of various denominations go thru our doors. Very few people are raised in Unity, I know of two in our congregation, most are ex-somethings. While our church (started 15 years ago) has a consistent and steady growth there are probably an equal amount of folks who pass thru our doors than stay. ie they come for a year or so, and then move on, (or back). Unity started not as a church but as a metaphysical study of the bible, its founders teaching weekday classes expecting attendees to return to their regular church membership on the sabbath. I think I still see that today, folks with issues the way something is presented develop a new understanding and which allows them to return to their old churches with new eyes and ears.

I often contemplate whether I'll be attending Unity services ten or twenty years from now. I don't know, I do know it feeds me now, and I am not committed to forever, I think there is a comfort level in that.

[Paladin]

Originally Posted by cyberpi

Does a Social Scientist have the social skills to talk with God?

I'm pretty sure they do, at least our dear friend Path Of One does. It was to her that sentence was directed.