www.comparative-religion.com
 
Comparative religion: 

world religions
 

Go Back   Interfaith forums > General > News
Register Code of Conduct Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

News News and announcements for the general site and forum

View Poll Results: Keep "Walled Garden" approach at CR?
Yes, the Walled Garden approach works well for me 18 62.07%
No, it's too restrictive for me 6 20.69%
I don't really have an opinion on the matter 5 17.24%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-11-2006, 08:29 PM   #46 (permalink)
Snoopy
here and now
 
Snoopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,785
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dor View Post
Let everyone post everything anywhere but let people in that forum call a spade a spade.
oooo-err will we be issued with blanks or live ammunition?
Snoopy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 09:02 PM   #47 (permalink)
Dor
Bible Thumper
 
Dor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: little town called Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,115
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
oooo-err will we be issued with blanks or live ammunition?
Hey I didnt ask for guns or bullets. Just the ability to tell people they are wrong or they are passing off garbage. Only ammo I need is my handy dandy pocket KJV bible to thump on.
Dor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 03:46 AM   #48 (permalink)
China Cat Sunflower
Executive Member
 
China Cat Sunflower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,070
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dor View Post
People show real fast if they are seriously asking or causing trouble.
Let everyone post everything anywhere but let people in that forum call a spade a spade.
There you go!

It's all well and good to be makey nicey, but wouldn't you rather people be real? I would. I'd rather knock the varnish off and see what's really there. With that in mind, I don't see why Bible thumpers shouldn't Bible thump. That's real. I expect it.

Chris
China Cat Sunflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 05:26 PM   #49 (permalink)
lunamoth
In the Spirit
 
lunamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Rockies
Posts: 3,144
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by China Cat Sunflower View Post
There you go!

It's all well and good to be makey nicey, but wouldn't you rather people be real? I would. I'd rather knock the varnish off and see what's really there. With that in mind, I don't see why Bible thumpers shouldn't Bible thump. That's real. I expect it.

Chris
The staff here have never stopped anyone from thumping their Bible if that is their style.

In my understanding, the gardens are not to keep viewpoints or opinions seperate (or out!) but to organize topics for discussion.

Reasonably good manners and avoiding personal attacks are expected in all the boards here.

2 c,
luna
lunamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 07:30 PM   #50 (permalink)
Prober
Give Us This Day...
 
Prober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,258
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunamoth View Post
The staff here have never stopped anyone from thumping their Bible if that is their style.

In my understanding, the gardens are not to keep viewpoints or opinions seperate (or out!) but to organize topics for discussion.

Reasonably good manners and avoiding personal attacks are expected in all the boards here.

2 c,
luna
After recently examining several other sites, I can see how much more organized this one is. It really does make it easier to find topics.

Other than for that point, I wouldn't care...
Prober is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 07:43 PM   #51 (permalink)
Dor
Bible Thumper
 
Dor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: little town called Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,115
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunamoth View Post
The staff here have never stopped anyone from thumping their Bible if that is their style.

In my understanding, the gardens are not to keep viewpoints or opinions seperate (or out!) but to organize topics for discussion.

Reasonably good manners and avoiding personal attacks are expected in all the boards here.

2 c,
luna
I would have to disagree with this I can give a list of names but I dont think I really need to anyone can go back throught the Christianity board.
Dor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 08:05 PM   #52 (permalink)
Snoopy
here and now
 
Snoopy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,785
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by China Cat Sunflower View Post
It's all well and good to be makey nicey, but wouldn't you rather people be real? I would. I'd rather knock the varnish off and see what's really there. Chris
Hi Chris,

Are real and makey nicey mutually exclusive? Can a person be real and makey nicey, not needing anything knocking off?

s.
Snoopy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 09:50 PM   #53 (permalink)
lunamoth
In the Spirit
 
lunamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Rockies
Posts: 3,144
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dor View Post
I would have to disagree with this I can give a list of names but I dont think I really need to anyone can go back throught the Christianity board.
I was referring to the staff here, the mods. I've not seen it but maybe you mean me?

Added in edit: unless you are referring to the fact that no one is supposed to just post long passages from anywhere (Bible included) or make posts that amount to just a link to another site. I've not seen that being an issue lately either, though
lunamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 03:02 AM   #54 (permalink)
China Cat Sunflower
Executive Member
 
China Cat Sunflower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,070
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
Hi Chris,

Are real and makey nicey mutually exclusive? Can a person be real and makey nicey, not needing anything knocking off?

s.
Well, maybe without the makey part, eh?

My main point was that I don't understand people being shocked that a Bible thumper would thump. That's what they do. It doesn't bother me, I expect it. Many people here are genuinely nice, that's real too. I'm not one of them, but...

Chris
China Cat Sunflower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 06:33 AM   #55 (permalink)
seattlegal
Why do cows say MU?
 
seattlegal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pacific Ring of Fire
Posts: 1,850
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunamoth View Post
I was referring to the staff here, the mods. I've not seen it but maybe you mean me?

Added in edit: unless you are referring to the fact that no one is supposed to just post long passages from anywhere (Bible included) or make posts that amount to just a link to another site. I've not seen that being an issue lately either, though
I'm guilty of this! However, not in the sense of spamming, I hope!
{I try to employ an economy of words whenever possible, and let the scriptures speak for themselves.}
seattlegal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 05:39 PM   #56 (permalink)
lunamoth
In the Spirit
 
lunamoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Rockies
Posts: 3,144
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlegal View Post
I'm guilty of this! However, not in the sense of spamming, I hope!
{I try to employ an economy of words whenever possible, and let the scriptures speak for themselves.}
It's a balance seattlegal. Links are allowed of course, especially when you make a short quote from somewhere else and want to reference it. Long cut & paste is a no-no in general, and posts that amount to links with little or no relevance or discussion are also a no no. Links to hate sites or prosyletizing sites also a no no. A little of this the mods would probably let go. A lot of it will get a warning. I've not seen you do any of those things.
lunamoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 08:20 PM   #57 (permalink)
cyberpi
Executive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,388
Re: Re-evaluating Walled Garden approach

It might require thinking outside the box, but I submit that in the ambiguity there are real differences between people in the interpretation of what a garden is:

What is a garden?
1. A religion.
2. A sect or denomination.
3. A place like a church, synagogue, mosque, etc...
3. A group of people conversing.
4. A sub-forum.
5. A place for gardeners to plant.
6. A place for people to learn about plants.
7. A place for people to learn about weeds and plants.
8. A place for people to be fixed or converted.
9. A place to admire plants.
10. A place to admire gardeners.

What is a gardener?
1. A person that makes a thread.
2. A person that posts.
3. A person that resembles the traits, characteristics, or practices described in a religion.
4. A person that posts something about the traits, characteristics, or practices described in a religion.
5. A person that weeds out posts.
6 A person that weeds out people.
7. A person that posts plants instead of weeds.
8. A person that converted you.
9. A person that loves you.
10. God

What is a plant?
1. A kind of topic.
2. A kind of post.
3. A kind of person.
4. Someone else's weed.
5. Something that makes people feel good.
6. Something that produces fruit.
7. Something that is on topic.
8. What the majority following a religion thinks a plant is.
9. What the majority posting in a sub-forum thinks a plant is.
10. What the moderator thinks a plant is.

What is a weed?
1. A kind of topic.
2. A kind of post.
3. A kind of person.
4. A plant.
5. Something that does not make people feel good.
6. Something that does not produce fruit.
7. Something that conflicts with plants.
8. What the majority following a religion thinks a weed is.
9. What the majority posting in a sub-forum thinks a weed is.
10. What the moderator thinks a weed is.

What is a bible thumper?
1. A person that thumps the bible.
2. A person that thumps other people with a bible.
3. A person that posts a particular type of post.
4. A person that has a strong opinion.
5. A person that tries to judge or separate sheep from goats per the bible.
6. A person that tries to judge weeds from plants per the bible.
7. A person that provides bible verses.
8. A person that says the bible is a book written by the creator.
9. A person that says the bible is the only book written by the creator.
10. A person that says Jesus is God or part of a Trinity.

In the vagueness, the ambiguity, or the metaphor... in the fact that some concepts or parables are already cemented differently for adherents of a particular religion... I see a source of conflict.

Who or what are the walls trying to separate... People? Religions? Forum topics? Perhaps greater clarity by breaking down the task:
1. who or what defines a religion.
2. who or what defines the acceptable topics of a forum or sub-forum.
3. who or what judges whether posts are on-topic.
4. who or what judges acceptable conduct, words, or phrases.
cyberpi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Walled Garden approach to CR I, Brian News 23 04-26-2006 01:58 PM
The Way You Approach the Text dauer Interfaith Parsha Project 4 09-11-2005 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.