Interafaith: Comparative religion: world religions

Go Back   Interfaith forums > Religion, Faith, and Theology > Abrahamic Religions > Christianity

Christianity Christian issues and discussions of Christianity.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-14-2004, 10:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
QUID EST VERITAS
 
Mus Zibii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 469
Mus Zibii is on a distinguished road
Name of Jesus

I'm by no means a scholar, and I'll readily admit that this notion is based on amateur speculation. So take pity on me.

Anyway, with the popularity of Mel Gibson's crap movie 'The Passion' I've started hearing one time anglo-obsessed Christians referring to Jesus as Yeshua. I can't help but wonder why this name wasn't transliterated into Greek or Latin as Joshua as opposed to Jesus.

In the Talmud and Jewish traditions of Jesus his name was 'parodied' with the acronym Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono (Talmud has a lot of obscure humor once its pointed out, like a New Yorker cartoon). Romanizing Yeshu would likely include the adding of the arbitrary (I'm sure there's a reason for it) additional S.

It doesn't seem natural that the romantic Greek rendering of the semitic name would result in Jesus. So I wondered if the adopted (yeah, I know its from the fourth century, not an air-tight theory, never said it was) Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono might've been mistaken by gentiles as a name rather than a rude title.
Mus Zibii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 04:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
R a i n b o w T r i b e
 
Quesocoatl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
Posts: 49
Quesocoatl is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mus Zibii
I'm by no means a scholar, and I'll readily admit that this notion is based on amateur speculation. So take pity on me.

Anyway, with the popularity of Mel Gibson's crap movie 'The Passion' I've started hearing one time anglo-obsessed Christians referring to Jesus as Yeshua. I can't help but wonder why this name wasn't transliterated into Greek or Latin as Joshua as opposed to Jesus.

In the Talmud and Jewish traditions of Jesus his name was 'parodied' with the acronym Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono (Talmud has a lot of obscure humor once its pointed out, like a New Yorker cartoon). Romanizing Yeshu would likely include the adding of the arbitrary (I'm sure there's a reason for it) additional S.

It doesn't seem natural that the romantic Greek rendering of the semitic name would result in Jesus. So I wondered if the adopted (yeah, I know its from the fourth century, not an air-tight theory, never said it was) Yimach Shemo Uzzikhrono might've been mistaken by gentiles as a name rather than a rude title.
I have no clue, myself.

I refer to him as "Isa", as I think the title is more suiting, but I thought it may be of interest to note that some people actually speculate that he, King Tut & Joshua of the Torah were, in fact, the same person.

I don't know what I think about all that but I would agree there appears to be some obscure sense of humor at work here.

How funny it is, I haven't decided yet.
Quesocoatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 04:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Ferally Decent
 
Abogado del Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 745
Abogado del Diablo is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quesocoatl
I refer to him as "Isa", as I think the title is more suiting, but I thought it may be of interest to note that some people actually speculate that he, King Tut & Joshua of the Torah were, in fact, the same person.
As are Mithras, the Buddah, Dionysis, Luke Skywalker and Spiderman.
Abogado del Diablo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 05:04 PM   #4 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 51
neoxenos is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mus Zibii
Anyway, with the popularity of Mel Gibson's crap movie 'The Passion' I've started hearing one time anglo-obsessed Christians referring to Jesus as Yeshua. I can't help but wonder why this name wasn't transliterated into Greek or Latin as Joshua as opposed to Jesus.
In my view...

Jesus is the living Pentagrammaton. If we take IHVH (Jehova) and place Shin in the middle, we get IHSVH, Yeshua, which was translated into Jesus because it has Five Letters, representing the Five Pointed Star.

Shin is the 21st Arcanum, and adding upon itself produces 3. Three is the number of Furies of Orestes, the number of murders or Orisis and Harim Abiff, and the number of trators of Jesus (Caiaphas, Judas, and Pilot). Three, on positive side, represents Trinity, the three aspects of creation. The Trinity is made known by listening to the words of our internal Yeshua (savior).

Jesus said:

And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. – Luke 9:22


Therefore, the three factors are to live (Father), to die (Son), and to sacrifice (Holy Spirit). We live through Conscious Love, die through Buddhist Annihilation, and sacrfice through Cognizant Charity. This is how man becomes the Pentagrammaton.

Yeshua is also IEOUA, a very powerful mantra.
neoxenos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 11:38 PM   #5 (permalink)
Soul Rebel
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 4,792
I, Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Another variant on the name I'm sure I've seen was "Yeshoshua".

My understanding was that the Greek form - Jesus - was used rather than the latinised forum - Joshua - because there is already a rather prominent Joshua in Jewish literature. The choice of form would be a way of easily avoiding confucian. Same with Saul of Tarus becoming Paul, to avoid confusing with King Saul of the David stories.
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2004, 11:58 PM   #6 (permalink)
Ferally Decent
 
Abogado del Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 745
Abogado del Diablo is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by I, Brian
Another variant on the name I'm sure I've seen was "Yeshoshua".

My understanding was that the Greek form - Jesus - was used rather than the latinised forum - Joshua - because there is already a rather prominent Joshua in Jewish literature. The choice of form would be a way of easily avoiding confucian. Same with Saul of Tarus becoming Paul, to avoid confusing with King Saul of the David stories.
Which is unfortunate if the author of the first version of the "Jesus" myth intended the name to be the same to signify that it is the same mythological character who led the Jews into the promised land to complete the Exodus.
Abogado del Diablo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2004, 03:47 AM   #7 (permalink)
QUID EST VERITAS
 
Mus Zibii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 469
Mus Zibii is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

I've returned from my journey out into the world of the mainstream religious and I've brought back some more interesting stuff on this topic. I thought this new theory was bogus until I went back and read some of the Talmudic traditions that surrounded the Jesus followers of the third/fourth century. Time and time again, Jesus as a figure is mentioned in relation to an 'ass', i.e. the Gamaliel's bribe of a Lybian ass, Yesu's corpse being dragged through Jerusalem by an ass in the Toledoth Yesu, etc.

In Hebrew the word for horse is sus, the sound transliterated in Latin characters as 'ge' or 'je' could possibly mean 'land' or abbreviated form of 'pride/arrogance', hence Ge-Sus = proud ass? LOL

At the least, its a neat theory.
Mus Zibii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2004, 10:27 AM   #8 (permalink)
Soul Rebel
 
I, Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 4,792
I, Brian is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Interesting theory.

And apologies for the bizarre typo earlier:
"The choice of form would be a way of easily avoiding confucian"
Confusion, of course.
I, Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2004, 01:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
QUID EST VERITAS
 
Mus Zibii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 469
Mus Zibii is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Found out last night after a search on the net, that the theory isn't anything new. There was also the idea that 'sus' is the Latin for pig. That seems to be stretching it a bit. It all seemed a bit stretched, but...
Mus Zibii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2004, 09:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
QUID EST VERITAS
 
Mus Zibii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 469
Mus Zibii is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quesocoatl
I refer to him as "Isa", as I think the title is more suiting, but....
I've been looking all over for the origin of I'sa. The meaning, I mean. I found the Christian response that it was either a mispronunciation of Iesus or that Muslims coming to Christian liturgy from afar heard Arab Jews refer to Jesus as the unfavoured son of Isaac, Esau. Islam is keen on reversing the unflattering Jewish myths.
Mus Zibii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2004, 10:03 PM   #11 (permalink)
Living by His Grace
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1
malachi is on a distinguished road
Smile Re: Name of Jesus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mus Zibii
I've returned from my journey out into the world of the mainstream religious and I've brought back some more interesting stuff on this topic. I thought this new theory was bogus until I went back and read some of the Talmudic traditions that surrounded the Jesus followers of the third/fourth century. Time and time again, Jesus as a figure is mentioned in relation to an 'ass', i.e. the Gamaliel's bribe of a Lybian ass, Yesu's corpse being dragged through Jerusalem by an ass in the Toledoth Yesu, etc.

In Hebrew the word for horse is sus, the sound transliterated in Latin characters as 'ge' or 'je' could possibly mean 'land' or abbreviated form of 'pride/arrogance', hence Ge-Sus = proud ass? LOL

At the least, its a neat theory.
I know that this was an old post, but I had to address this topic. This was an interesting post indeed. I'm not that familiar with the Hebrew or Greek Languages. Yet, what I do understand is that there are many names, and attributes given to Jesus which are in both the Old and New Testaments. Such as the following:

Immanuel:- Isaiah 7:14
The Anointed. - 1 Samuel 2:35
The Branch. - Zechariah 3:8
The Chief Cornerstone - Ephesians 2:20, 1 Peter 2:6
Wonderful - Isaiah 9:6
Counselor - Isaiah 9:6
The Mighty God - Isaiah 9:6
The everlasting Father - Isaiah 9:6
The Prince of Peace - Isaiah 9:6
Mine Elect - Isaiah 42:1
A Stumbling Block - 1 Corinthians 1:23
Lord also of the Sabbath - Mark 2:28
Son of Man - Mark 2:28
The Light of the Morning - 2 Samuel 23:3-4
A Sure Foundation - Isaiah 28:16

And there are many others. Almost too many to note here, but as you can see there is an almost exhaustive list. I only hope that this clears up any confusion as to the Name of Jesus.

But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asks you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: 1 Peter 3:15
malachi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2004, 09:10 AM   #12 (permalink)
QUID EST VERITAS
 
Mus Zibii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 469
Mus Zibii is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Well, see that goes toward my 'blotted out name' theory. The idea of a messiah or embodiment of God having a generic Hebrew name seems queer. Whereas a nameless God, named after his namelessness... now that's class. None of that Gott 'n Elah stuff.

Exodus 3:14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM. Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.

Mark 14:62 And Jesus said, I AM.
Mus Zibii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2004, 10:56 AM   #13 (permalink)
QUID EST VERITAS
 
Mus Zibii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 469
Mus Zibii is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

Got another theory. LOL One a day, seems like. Since Christian prophecy of Jesus was seen in Isaiah more clearly and more abundantly than any other book of Jewish prophecy, could it be that Mahomet who claimed erroneously that Jesus had written a book (subsequently perverted by Christians), have mistaken Isaiah's authorship as he did with the Pslams of David?

Hmmm, this one's my favorite thus far.
Mus Zibii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2004, 10:56 AM   #14 (permalink)
Smile: God loves you!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Where am I from? None of your business, eh! Hosers...
Posts: 182
Marsh is on a distinguished road
Re: Name of Jesus

A rose, by any other name, would still smell as sweet.
Marsh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jesus is not God....part 2 bruce Christianity 323 08-15-2008 10:07 AM
Catholic Satanism Ralf Biermann Christianity 24 10-10-2007 11:55 PM
The Messiah and the Spirit Ralf Biermann Christianity 22 12-03-2006 03:33 AM
The Jesus Seminar Dave the Web Christianity 7 03-27-2005 05:04 AM
Mystic teachings of Jesus Avinash Esoteric 9 12-06-2004 01:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.