Marijuana

[mee]

Originally Posted by Tao_Equus

Lol...Mee. Obviously it has not worked. Rather than try to get through to you with a bit of rational common sense I'm just gona beat my head off this here wall.

Tao

talking about intoxification, there is a great spiritual intoxification going on . and there are many spiritual drunkards out there. and they are called religious leaders .
and those religious leaders claim to represent the God of the bible . it is very similar to the days that ISAIAH spoke of .


And these also—because of wine they have gone astray and because of intoxicating liquor they have wandered about. Priest and prophet—they have gone astray because of intoxicating liquor, they have become confused as a result of the wine, they have wandered about as a result of the intoxicating liquor; they have gone astray in their seeing, they have reeled as to decision. isaiah 28;7


The spiritual drunkards of those ancient nations well foreshadow the spiritual leaders of today.


As a result, they have no true spiritual guidance to give. They vomit out uncleanness rather than speaking the pure message of truth. (Zephaniah 3:9) With their vision blurred and confused, they are no safe guides for mankind.—Matthew 15:14.

[Tao_Equus]

Originally Posted by mee

talking about intoxification, there is a great spiritual intoxification going on . and there are many spiritual drunkards out there. and they are called.......

......amongst others, but certainly prominently.....Jehovas Witnesses.

Tao

[Pathless]

Intoxification: [en-toks-uh-fuh-kay-shun]

-noun

1. The state of being inebriated beyond sensible vocabulary.
2. Overpowering numbing of the faculties of proper thought and communication brought about by excessive consumption of alcohol, narcotics, religion, or television.

as in: <Homer, reeling with intoxification, taunted the police, yelling, "What's wrong, occifers??! Never sheen a naked white man before?">

[Origin: late 20th century/early 21st century]

[mee]

Originally Posted by Pathless

Intoxification: [en-toks-uh-fuh-kay-shun]

-noun

1. The state of being inebriated beyond sensible vocabulary.
]

yes thats about it, no sensibleness at all .
How surprised they will be when they are aroused from their spiritual drunken stupor by the great and fear-inspiring day of Jehovah!

[Tao_Equus]

Originally Posted by mee

yes thats about it, no sensibleness at all .
How surprised they will be when they are aroused from their spiritual drunken stupor by the great and fear-inspiring day of Jehovah!

fear-inspiring? really sounds like the kind of psycho u wanna spend eternity with

[China Cat Sunflower]

Originally Posted by juantoo3

I always figured it was because there were more profits to be made by keeping it contraband.

Keeping weed illegal keeps the price down and the quality up. I hope it's never legalized.

Chris

[Quahom1]

Originally Posted by China Cat Sunflower

Keeping weed illegal keeps the price down and the quality up. I hope it's never legalized.

Chris

May I never catch you with "weed" Chris.

v/r

Joshua

[wil]

Originally Posted by China Cat Sunflower

Keeping weed illegal keeps the price down and the quality up. I hope it's never legalized.

Ya think? I always thought the variety and quality would go through the roof while the price would go through the floor. Even if they taxed it 400% I'd say the price would be less than 25% of what it is now.

Originally Posted by Quahom1

May I never catch you with "weed" Chris.

you think your cutter will make it that far inland? Gotta watch that judgement thing Q, comes back to bite us sometimes..

[mee]

Originally Posted by Tao_Equus

fear-inspiring? really sounds like the kind of psycho u wanna spend eternity with

Jehovah’s

Fear-Inspiring Day Is Near

"A book of remembrance began to be written up before him for those in fear of Jehovah and for those thinking upon his name."—MALACHI 3:16.

[mee]

You Can Say No!
Drugs Hinder Growth in more ways than one

[flowperson]

Thank you Nancy !

flow....

[Tao_Equus]

Originally Posted by mee

Jehovah’s

Fear-Inspiring Day Is Near

Omg!! Is it really? Will sheltering under the table help?

Great excuse to do bugger all really useful for your fellow man tho aint it

I shmelllls a cop out.

Tao

[Tao_Equus]

Originally Posted by Quahom1

May I never catch you with "weed" Chris.

v/r

Joshua

OOOOOHHHHHH...... big hairy scary Q!!

But you been rumbled Q!! I know why you so against it and I present the evidence to prove it!!

Q eats brownies.....
YouTube - Cop Eats Pot Brownies & Calls 911

[China Cat Sunflower]

Originally Posted by wil

Ya think? I always thought the variety and quality would go through the roof while the price would go through the floor. Even if they taxed it 400% I'd say the price would be less than 25% of what it is now.

In the late seventies when I was in high school quarter z cost $15. Now, thirty years later, the same QZ still costs $15. In 1978 the cost of a pack of cigarettes was about fifty cents. Today a pack of smokes is approaching six bucks. I rest my case.

Chris

[wil]

a story, any connection to known or unknown people, real situations or circumstances are purely coincidental

1973 back seat of a thunderbird with the connection. At the time pounds of mexican are going for a buck and a half, he wants three bills for something called columbian gold or four for panama red. I scoff we are getting fifteen a lid for seedy stemmy mexican, they'll never pay thirty or forty for this. They not only did but five years later were paying five times that much for an ounce of the sticky chrystaline seedless stuff.

Cost to grow the good stuff, utilizing clones and grow lights...2-3% of retail value. Move it outside to the hills of Appalachia or northern california mountains and the cost is about a half a percent, losses due to irradications, busts, thieves are all part of the cost of doing business in an industry that grosses more than any 'legitimate' crop and pays no taxes. Entrepreneurs making mid six figures with little time investment. If it was commercially farmed indoors or outdoors the profits would be significantly less for the growers, yet easily still substantial.