www.comparative-religion.com
 
Comparative religion: 

world religions
 

Go Back   Interfaith forums > Secularism > Science and the Universe
Register Code of Conduct Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Science and the Universe Science, scientific theories, and how they impact our view of the world and existence.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-02-2007, 03:45 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tao_Equus
Rider on the storm...
 
Tao_Equus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, scotland
Posts: 3,016
Send a message via Skype™ to Tao_Equus
Is Plate Tectonic Theory Wrong?

I came across some clips on Youtube in which this guy, Neal Adams, says that our current geological model of subducting continental plates is wrong. He contends that Pangea never existed as a huge island on one side of the Earth, with a huge ocean on the other. Instead he states that all the continental land masses were joined together on an Earth about half its current size. And that the oceans we now see were formed when the Earth expanded like an inflating balloon, separating the continents.

His argument is compelling as told in the video clips he presents on his website and he shows 'evidence' that the same process has taken place on Mars and Ganymede, a moon of Jupiter. I have not looked at every bit of his site yet so perhaps I am missing it but the one big obvious flaw in his ideas are where did the huge volumes of water that make up the worlds oceans come from? The only possible source would be Earths interior... which intuitively seems unlikely.

Anyhow this is an interesting idea and I wonder if any of you have read about it in any detail and can offer your thoughts?

This is the link to his website:
Neal Adams Science Project New Model of the Universe Two Guys in a Bar



Tao
Tao_Equus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 04:00 PM   #2 (permalink)
dauer
Super Moderator
 
dauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near Boston
Posts: 2,156
Re: Is Plate Tectonic Theory Wrong?

Here's a WIRED article about the guy:

Wired 9.03: Master of the Universe

edit: Just finished reading the article. Seems like a very charismatic and kooky guy. Probably a lot of fun to be around, but with some danger of communicable verbal diarrhea. Also sounds like he has a particular liking for being the lone champion of justice, fighting off a seemingly omnipotent evil behemoth. Will Adams avoid almost certain doom at the clutches of the cantankerous curmudgeons of science? Will the Earth grow greater in girth than Jupiter? Tune in next time, Adam-friends. Same Adams time. Same Adams channel.

Last edited by dauer : 08-02-2007 at 04:31 PM. Reason: It's peanut butter jelly time!
dauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 04:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tao_Equus
Rider on the storm...
 
Tao_Equus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, scotland
Posts: 3,016
Send a message via Skype™ to Tao_Equus
Re: Is Plate Tectonic Theory Wrong?

Thx Dauer,

Well I am relieved to see that he's not pushing anyone's ideas but his own, and they are interesting. I never read anything before your link that suggested he was applying expansion as a universal principle... this is even more fascinating and one that my mind leaps toward as explaining a number of unanswered questions in current models.

Last thing I needed at the moment was yet another avenue I want to go down... so much to do... so little time!! Jury not in on him yet I think.

Tao

Edit: response to your edit.

Have you had a look at his website and the clips he's put together to back his ideas? They are compelling. And it seems he believes "everything" is expanding, not just Earth. This would explain some things science really struggles with.
Tao_Equus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 05:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tao_Equus
Rider on the storm...
 
Tao_Equus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh, scotland
Posts: 3,016
Send a message via Skype™ to Tao_Equus
Re: Is Plate Tectonic Theory Wrong?

Read a bit more. He seems to have a poor grasp of scientific orthodoxy, makes sweeping statements that contain huge errors of reason. Seems he is just a...... erm ....crackpot.
Tao_Equus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 06:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
dauer
Super Moderator
 
dauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near Boston
Posts: 2,156
Re: Is Plate Tectonic Theory Wrong?

His almost blind enthusiasm throughout the interview gave me that sense at the start (and I was a little wary of the way he was being portrayed because of the clear anti-crackpot bias to the tone of the article), but the fourth page is really the kicker, especially scouring the web all night for ways to possibly account for a fact he wasn't aware of before within his theory and then quickly lighting up when a hypothetical energy to support his hypothetical matter is suggested.
dauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 04:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
Neemai
that's my Boss in the pic
 
Neemai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: England
Posts: 209
Re: Is Plate Tectonic Theory Wrong?

Here's a related concept - although it would be at odds with Mr Adams theory:

Continents in Collision: Pangea Ultima

(PANGEA ULTIMA)


... Neemai
Neemai is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Islams position on Evolution madina Islam 25 06-09-2006 06:47 PM
New Book on Islam & the theory of evolution tufail Islam 12 11-02-2005 11:26 PM
Greatest Proof of a Lack of a Deity? pseudonymous Belief and Spirituality 123 10-26-2005 08:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.