|
||||||||
|
|||||||
| Belief and Spirituality General thinking beyond the boundaries of religion and organised belief |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Watcher
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 454
|
Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Having been raised in America, every image that was presented to me as "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" and for that matter (Demons) have been of "Euro-centric males" with long hair, horns,wings, red skin, horse legs and Euro-centric facial features.
If I were to come from a place that knew nothing of "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" or any other demonic creature, Would it be "ok" to present this image as Euro-centric, Asian, or any other race? My question: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male" with long hair, horns, wings, red skin, horse legs and Euro-centric facial features. Any thoughts? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 175
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Well, perhaps so. I mean, Christianity really took off in Europe centuries and centuries ago, so it wouldn't be all that strange if his facial features would suggest men such as those most common in Europe at the time, and that such a model would be kept for quite a while. LOL...I can only picture some official Christian organization holding a panel complete with sketch artists to redesign Satan...you know, give him a new, modern look
Furthermore, Satan's demonic look is largely inherited from even older renditions of Pagan images, especially that of Pan. These, too, were images designed by Europeans. Christianity didn't take too well to Paganism, so in many cases, they adopted Pagan symbolism to portray evil things. So, in a sense, the 'euro-look' for the classic image of Satan has been around for probably three-thousand years or so. -jiii |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
UNeyeR1
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,687
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Quote:
Screwtape, now that is one of my favorite devil images, not the drawings but the letters. I don't subscribe to any critter out there doing damage....but internal doubt, fear, thoughts I need to personally overcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
~~~~~~~~~
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gator Country, FL, USA
Posts: 4,155
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Kindest Regards, Yo-eleven!
Seems I seldom get around to conversing with you, which is my loss. Quote:
Interestingly, to me anyway, is the Jewish perception of the devil. He is more an adversary, a prosecuting attorney so to speak. As for myself, I view the "embodiment" of evil more like a black hole, an eternal separateness from which there is no return. Just my humble opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
~~~~~~~~~
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gator Country, FL, USA
Posts: 4,155
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
~~~~~~~~~
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gator Country, FL, USA
Posts: 4,155
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Gawain and the Greene Knight
The Horned One Santa Theory particularly post 31, 38 and 43 What is the meaning of 'Hell' interesting discussion of hell Debunking "the devil"... very good thread, my post 35 tells about Dante Hope this helps |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Watcher
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 454
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Quote:
I will check out the threads and screwtape. This is my first time hearing of screwtape. Is it a book? Where can I get a copy of it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
~~~~~~~~~
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gator Country, FL, USA
Posts: 4,155
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Kindest Regards, jiii!
Quote:
Christianity has always been in direct competition (for the hearts, minds, "souls" and political power base) with Paganism. That's just the way the history of Christianity has unfolded, starting at Rome and especially through the Christianization of Europe under Charlemagne (Creating the Holy Roman Empire, which was effectively Europe). Of course, there have been sidebars such as the Inquisition disguised as rooting out Pagans when they seem to have actually been a tool to exert political authority (far more Christians were executed). In actual practice, paganism has always been unofficially tolerated in the more rural areas in Europe (else why does it still exist?) In point of fact, most "conversions" to Christianity during Charlemagne's campaigns were superficial at best: a priest stood upstream and blessed the waters of a stream, and those "subjects" to be converted were herded through the stream. Viola! Instant baptism into Christianity! Most of these "converts" went back home and continued doing what they always had been doing. As long as they paid their taxes and didn't create any trouble or unrest or challenge the authority, they were left alone to do as they pleased. Where it was distinctly *not* safe to be Pagan, was in the major cities and centers of political power. Paganism was always a nature oriented religion (by my understanding), so it has always been "at home" in the rural farming districts. Christianity, as the tool of the political machine, was the safe bet in the centers of power, yet even then it clearly became a matter of "this" Christian (political power) versus "that" Christian (political power). In the space of 500 years or so, Christianity had pretty well imploded on itself, and the Protestant Reformation pretty well set the stage to salvage any semblance of virtue left in the institution and wrest the power away from Rome. Since then it has been pretty much a two-party system, speaking in terms of religious institutions, and now it seems there are greater efforts to cooperate rather than compete. Especially with Paganism, never truly gone and currently experiencing a huge groundswell (largely from those dissatisfied and disaffected with Christianity). In many places and many ways, it is now fashionable and in vogue to be Pagan, whereas it seems increasingly passe to be a card carrying Christian. I wonder what influence that would have on the perception of and personification of the devil? (BTW, I am very aware that "Pagan" does not equal "devil worship," and I in absolutely no way wish to seem to imply such) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
~~~~~~~~~
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Gator Country, FL, USA
Posts: 4,155
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Watcher
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 454
|
Re: Is "Lucifer" or "The Devil" or "Satan" a "Euro-centric male"?
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|