Is it possible to have a dialogue about "the Truth"

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by lunamoth

So, no vehicle, no raft. Just swim.

?

luna

Use whatever vehicle you want. Just understand it's only a vehicle and not the destination.

[cyberpi]

Originally Posted by Abogado del Diablo

Use whatever vehicle you want. Just understand it's only a vehicle and not the destination.

The truth in Islam, the religion of truth, is about the way you use your vehicle, not its destination. The destination back to Allah (swt) is a given... everyone dies. (the flesh)

I have my understanding of what truth is... that truth is a symmetry. A lie is an anti-symmetry. Ignorance is neither. I can speak or share a truth, I can truly worship, I can confess or repent a truth, I can make a truth daily. I don't understand these other definitions of truth presented though, so I have a few questions:

Can people explain what a lie, or a falsehood is?
Is a lie the opposite of a truth?
If there is one truth then is there one lie? If there are multiple truths are there multiple lies?
Can people explain what a secret is? Or ignorance? Is that a lack of truth?
If there is one truth then can it be portioned into partial truths? If I know that I don't know something, then do I have a portion of the truth?
If a truth is mixed with lies do you get something new? Is the truth corrupted and no longer the truth?
Can the truth be duplicated? Can a lie be duplicated? Can ignorance be duplicated?
How is a truth removed? How is a lie removed? How is ignorance removed?

For those who say there is One Truth, are you reconciling that a lie is also a truth? That ignorance or a secret is also a truth? Or, are you trying to keep it clean from everything else, like separating water from the contaminants that swim in it. I can reconcile the former and say there is one truth, but I suspect that most people are still thinking the latter when they say there is one. This thread bears witness to that.

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by cyberpi

If there is one truth then is there one lie? If there are multiple truths are there multiple lies?
Can people explain what a secret is? Or ignorance? Is that a lack of truth?
If there is one truth then can it be portioned into partial truths? If I know that I don't know something, then do I have a portion of the truth?

Excellent questions! Seems like as good a time as any to bring up the Parable of the Blind Men and the Elephant:

A number of disciples went to the Buddha and said, "Sir, there are living here in Savatthi many wandering hermits and scholars who indulge in constant dispute, some saying that the world is infinite and eternal and others that it is finite and not eternal, some saying that the soul dies with the body and others that it lives on forever, and so forth. What, Sir, would you say concerning them?"
The Buddha answered, "Once upon a time there was a certain raja who called to his servant and said, 'Come, good fellow, go and gather together in one place all the men of Savatthi who were born blind... and show them an elephant.' 'Very good, sire,' replied the servant, and he did as he was told. He said to the blind men assembled there, 'Here is an elephant,' and to one man he presented the head of the elephant, to another its ears, to another a tusk, to another the trunk, the foot, back, tail, and tuft of the tail, saying to each one that that was the elephant.
"When the blind men had felt the elephant, the raja went to each of them and said to each, 'Well, blind man, have you seen the elephant? Tell me, what sort of thing is an elephant?'
"Thereupon the men who were presented with the head answered, 'Sire, an elephant is like a pot.' And the men who had observed the ear replied, 'An elephant is like a winnowing basket.' Those who had been presented with a tusk said it was a ploughshare. Those who knew only the trunk said it was a plough; others said the body was a grainery; the foot, a pillar; the back, a mortar; the tail, a pestle, the tuft of the tail, a brush.
"Then they began to quarrel, shouting, 'Yes it is!' 'No, it is not!' 'An elephant is not that!' 'Yes, it's like that!' and so on, till they came to blows over the matter.
"Brethren, the raja was delighted with the scene.
"Just so are these preachers and scholars holding various views blind and unseeing.... In their ignorance they are by nature quarrelsome, wrangling, and disputatious, each maintaining reality is thus and thus."
Then the Exalted One rendered this meaning by uttering this verse of uplift,

• O how they cling and wrangle, some who claim For preacher and monk the honored name! For, quarreling, each to his view they cling. Such folk see only one side of a thing.

Thoughts?

[jiii]

A very appropriate story toward the discussion, I think. The Buddha's example clearly illustrates a scenario in which it is seen that all concepts considered "true" are inevitably only partly true. That is, each blind man argued correctly based upon what he felt of the elephant. The blind man that felt the head to be like a pot was certainly correct! But, he was mistaken in that he assumed that because he felt the head alone, that MUST be all that there was to the elephant.

It seems that many people, even those that spend a good deal of time examining and philosophizing upon the subtleties of life, fail to realize what Socrates meant when he said "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." This, I think, is a sentiment widely misunderstood or hastily-rejected nowadays. Though, it might surprise some that Socrates made this statement in response to the famed Oracle at Delphi calling him "the wisest man in the land"...an amazingly rare title. This put him in the astounding position of being almost universally justified in accepting the claim and building a life of grandeur from there on. Yet he denied the claim, and went on to say that if he were the wisest man, it was only because he knew how little he really knew.

[kenod]

So, the truth is that no one knows the Truth ... is that the truth?

[kenod]

And, if no one knows the Truth, how can anyone know that no one knows the Truth!

[kenod]

It seems to me that "no one knows the Truth" is an article of faith, no different to a denominational creed.

The best anyone can do is to say "I do not know the Truth".

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by kenod

The best anyone can do is to say "I do not know the Truth".

Correct. That is the best anyone can say.

[Abogado del Diablo]

Kenod:

Help me discover the truth then. Do you know that Jesus Christ became incarnate from the Virgin Mary?

[kenod]

Originally Posted by Abogado del Diablo

Help me discover the truth then. Do you know that Jesus Christ became incarnate from the Virgin Mary?

Well, I know that Jesus Christ was God incarnate.

Faith is how we know the unknown and the unprovable. Faith, like love, cannot be fully appreciated and understood until it is personally experienced. It is a sixth sense, just as real as the other five, by which we contact the supernatural.

The natural world presents us with absolute truth … so why not the supernatural world? Instead of a dichotomy, why not a continuum between the natural and supernatural. If one operates according to inviolable rules, why not the other?

Cosmology traces the birth of the universe back to the big bang, where science merges with faith.
The investigation of sub-atomic particles takes physics into the realms of philosophy.
And most of us have probably had experiences which blur the distinction between normal and paranormal, such as ESP, or dreams that have foretold the future.

The unseen world blends with the natural world in an harmonious continuum. So it would seem that both operate according to fixed principles, which represent the absolute Truth.


While we can speak of The Truth as a global concept, in reality we can only experience aspects of the Truth. As Paul said:

“For now we see through a glass, darkly;
but then face to face:
now I know in part;
but then shall I know even as also I am known.” (1 Cor 13:12).

On a daily basis we face moral dilemmas which we resolve according to our beliefs. A person can feel certain they are right in one situation, and uncertain in another: I believe that murder is wrong, but should I support the fighting in Iraq? I believe that children should be protected, but what about abortion? And if I believe abortion is wrong, do I believe it is wrong in every instance (eg, pregnancy resulting from rape)?

Recognition of the absolute Truth, in both the natural and supernatural world, is entirely consistent with an integrated view of life. We can posit that no person knows the whole Truth, but that is different from saying that there is no absolute Truth.

The most common protest against a belief in absolute Truth is that it leads to disharmony and conflict. Conflict occurs when not everyone understands or obeys the road rules - and yet there is still only one set of road rules. Conflict only occurs when the Truth is misunderstood or abused.

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by kenod

Well, I know that Jesus Christ was God incarnate.

That wasn't my question though.

[Paladin]

I have a question that might be pertinent here.
If we can agree that there is in fact an absolute truth, can we discuss it or speculate about it without trying to define it? My own belief is that dialogue should be mutually edifying. Therefore we should be able to feel as if our collective consciousness has improved because of our intercourse nicht wahr?

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by Paladin

I have a question that might be pertinent here.
If we can agree that there is in fact an absolute truth, can we discuss it or speculate about it without trying to define it?

I think that's a very pertinent question. Do we start with "what is the truth?" and then justify our answers? or do we begin with "how might we know the truth" and go where it may lead us?

I opt for the latter because I think it will result in a more productive dialogue. I could be wrong about that though.

[kenod]

Originally Posted by Abogado del Diablo

That wasn't my question though.

Then you will need to help me understand your question. I rephrased it to express my understanding of what you asked. It seems I have not interpreted you correctly ... something my wife often complains of!!

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by kenod

Then you will need to help me understand your question. I rephrased it to express my understanding of what you asked. It seems I have not interpreted you correctly ... something my wife often complains of!!

My question is "Do you know that Jesus Christ became incarnate from the Virgin Mary?" It's taken almost verbatim from the English translation of the Nicene Creed as used by Lutherans and Episcopaleans.