Immaculate Conception and Descendance

[Abogado del Diablo]

Originally Posted by Bandit

I dont feel it is something i need to prove, but I know that some feel they need to or disprove it.

Too true. It really doesn't matter to me. The only reason I brought it up is because I'd never heard Luke 3 referred to as Mary's genealogy and never read or understood it that way myself. Either way, it really doesn't matter.

In any case, if someone is dead set on believing it is or it isn't, they aren't going to consider the question anyway. "All lies and jest, still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest."

I was just curious about why this was thought of as Mary's genealogy when its plain language indentifies it as Joseph's. A more convincing case, to me, is made for the plain language. It's Joseph's genealogy.

In my opinion.